United States

This paper studies the impact of retrieved ideologically framed texts on the outputs of large language models (LLMs). While interest in understanding ideological framing in LLMs has recently increased, little attention has been given to this issue in the context of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). To fill this gap, we design an external knowledge source based on ideologically framed texts about COVID-19 treatments. Our corpus is based on 1,117 academic articles representing discourses about controversial and endorsed treatments for the disease. We propose a corpus linguistics framework, based on Lexical Multidimensional Analysis (LMDA), to identify discourse dimensions within the corpus. LLMs are tasked to answer questions derived from three identified discourse dimensions, and two types of contextual prompts are adopted: the first comprises the user question and ideologically framed texts; and the second contains the question, ideologically framed texts, and LMDA descriptions. Alignment between reference ideologically framed texts and LLMs&#39; responses is assessed using cosine similarity for lexical and semantic representations. Results demonstrate that retrieved ideologically framed texts influence LLM responses toward the discourse framing represented in the external knowledge, with enhanced prompts further amplifying this effect. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying ideological framings within the RAG framework in order to mitigate not just unintended ideological bias, but also the risks of intentional discourse steering of such models.

ACL 2026

Uncovering Ideological Bias in RAG with Lexical Multidimensional Analysis: A Case Study on COVID-19

ideological bias

retrieval augmented generation

semantic similarity

lexical semantics

discourse

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair: 
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025. ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.* 
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

ACL 2025

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

This paper studies the impact of retrieved ideologically framed texts on the outputs of large language models (LLMs). While interest in understanding ideological framing in LLMs has recently increased, little attention has been given to this issue in the context of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). To fill this gap, we design an external knowledge source based on ideologically framed texts about COVID-19 treatments. Our corpus is based on 1,117 academic articles representing discourses about controversial and endorsed treatments for the disease. We propose a corpus linguistics framework, based on Lexical Multidimensional Analysis (LMDA), to identify discourse dimensions within the corpus. LLMs are tasked to answer questions derived from three identified discourse dimensions, and two types of contextual prompts are adopted: the first comprises the user question and ideologically framed texts; and the second contains the question, ideologically framed texts, and LMDA descriptions. Alignment between reference ideologically framed texts and LLMs' responses is assessed using cosine similarity for lexical and semantic representations. Results demonstrate that retrieved ideologically framed texts influence LLM responses toward the discourse framing represented in the external knowledge, with enhanced prompts further amplifying this effect. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying ideological framings within the RAG framework in order to mitigate not just unintended ideological bias, but also the risks of intentional discourse steering of such models.

workshop paper

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Compositionality is considered central to language abilities. As performant language systems, how do large language models (LLMs) do on compositional tasks? We evaluate adjective–noun compositionality in LLMs using two complementary setups: prompt-based functional assessment and a representational analysis of internal model states. Our results reveal a striking divergence between task performance and internal states. While LLMs reliably develop compositional representations, they fail to translate consistently into functional task success across model variants. Consequently, we highlight the importance of contrastive evaluation for obtaining a more complete understanding of model capabilities.

Evaluating Adjective-Noun Compositionality in LLMs: Functional vs Representational Perspectives

We evaluate GPT-4o's color naming across nine languages using both synthetic and human-derived stimuli. Using hue wheels, fixed basic categories, low-chroma hue lines, and dense binned CIELAB grids, we separate lexical availability of color terms from distributional agreement with human color naming. GPT-4o reliably names vivid, high-chroma colors and reproduces several known language-specific distinctions under constrained settings. However, its performance degrades sharply for low-chroma colors and for stimuli near human category boundaries. In these regions, model-human divergence remains high. 
Overall, GPT-4o shows strong cross-linguistic lexical knowledge but does not reliably match human color-naming distributions, especially in low-chroma and boundary regions.

Lexical Availability and Human Distributional Agreement in GPT-4o's Color Naming

Zero-shot Named Entity Recognition is critical for low-resource domains, yet existing approaches rely on opaque prompting of large language models or dense representations that suffer from polysemanticity. We propose an alternative approach that leverages monosemantic features of Sparse Autoencoders. We introduce $\textbf{SAE-NER}$, a training-free framework that maps monosemantic SAE feature activations to entity types through direct precision estimation, requiring no supervision or prompting. Experiments across general and biomedical domains show that SAE-NER consistently outperforms trained probing classifiers, with especially a large margin in the biomedical domain (up to +20 F1). Finally, we evaluate the utility of SAE-NER predictions as silver training data for downstream NER models. Using controlled perturbations of gold annotations to simulate realistic annotation noise, we show that false negatives are the primary bottleneck for silver-data quality, outweighing the impact of boundary imprecision and false positives.

From Latents to Labels: Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition using Sparse Autoencoder Features

Large language models (LLMs) appear successful in emulating compositional language, yet it remains unclear what these results entail about their underlying compositional semantic representations. The probing classifier paradigm has emerged as a tool to remedy this. This paper proposes to critically review the findings of 24 probing studies targeting a wide range of linguistic and semantic phenomena. It proposes a taxonomy of probing tasks based on the linguistic primitives they presuppose, distinguishing four tiers: lexical semantics, the syntax–semantics interface, propositional semantics, and discourse and pragmatics. A gradient in representational evidence emerges: LLMs robustly encode lexical information, display less consistent sensitivity to structural relations within sentences, and obtain unsatisfactory results on tasks requiring propositional content, speech acts, or pragmatic inference. The review underscores the need for a clearer theoretical grounding of what probing tasks measure and reflects on how probing can illuminate the compositional pathways available within current language models.

Compositional Meaning Representations in LLMs: a Critical Review of Probing Studies

We present a systematic study on paraphrase detection in Tamil by constructing a unified dataset through translation and semantic verification of three English benchmarks QQP, PAWS, and MRPC. Unlike prior efforts that focus on individual sources or limited scales, our dataset combines multiple paraphrase detection paradigms and is evaluated using semantic similarity metrics, round-trip translation checks, and classifier agreement analysis. We fine-tune five multilingual transformer models (mBERT, XLM-R, IndicBERT, MuRIL, and DistilmBERT) and a Tamil-specific compact model, TLMR (Tamil Language Model - DeBERTa), pretrained on 525M Tamil tokens. Furthermore, we assess the representational quality of the sentence embeddings that are taken from these models using lightweight classifiers (SVM, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression). We formulate an efficiency-oriented metric that incorporates top-5 accuracy, vocabulary usage, and script fidelity in relation to perplexity in order to facilitate resource-aware evaluation. The experimental findings lay the groundwork for future Tamil semantic understanding tasks by highlighting differences in generalization and efficiency across models.

Under the Surface: Probing Tamil Paraphrase Intelligence

Social biases based on regional identity (or regional bias) are often observed in Indian contexts on major online social networks and require critical attention. However, due to large linguistic and cultural diversity, high annotation costs, and inherent human biases, very little annotated data exists on regional biases in the Indian context. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered attention for the automatic annotation of text. However, such annotation efforts are largely limited to English texts, and LLMs often perform poorly when applied to low-resource languages. Therefore, this paper focuses on understanding the capabilities and challenges of popular open-source LLMs in annotating Indian regional biases. We utilize the recently proposed IndRegBias dataset, which consists of Indian regionally biased social media comments in both English and code-mixed formats.
First, we assess the annotation capabilities of LLMs in a zero-shot setting and critically analyze their performance across different writing styles, including code-mixing, transliteration, and English. We find that the majority of LLMs exhibit low agreement with human annotations (measured using Cohen’s kappa). Consequently, we extend our study by fine-tuning the models using 50% of the data and evaluating them on the remaining 50%. We observe a significant improvement in annotation agreement (kappa) for all the LLMs. To further assess the capabilities of the fine-tuned models, we evaluate them on 500 newly collected social media comments discussing regional issues in India. The results show that most fine-tuned LLMs outperform their zero-shot counterparts when annotating these new comments.

Annotating Indian Regional Biases using Large Language Models: Evaluation and Analysis

Updating bilingual dictionary entries is a tedious, time-consuming, and highly subjective task, especially when a new sense in the source language requires identifying an appropriate translation equivalent. To date, there have been no attempts to automatize the discovery of new bilingual sense entries. Related tasks such as Word-level Bilingual Dictionary Induction and cross-lingual embedding alignment do not account for polysemy and are not applied to lexicographic data.
In contrast to their monolingual counterparts, bilingual dictionaries fall short in terms of completeness, detail with respect to examples and glosses, and diachronic information.
We introduce a novel NLP task, Sense-Level Bilingual Dictionary Induction (\textsc{SenseBDI}), at the intersection of lexical semantics, cross-lingual, and diachronic NLP.
We construct a dataset of time-stamped sense-level bilingual dictionary entries by aligning two bilingual dictionaries, two monolingual dictionaries, and the multilingual resource BabelNet, thereby enriching bilingual entries with monolingual source-language information.
We propose a baseline based on nearest-neighbor search over cross-lingual embeddings of glosses and usages. We find that usages contribute more strongly than glosses, with substantial variation across language pairs and discuss task-specific challenges with regards to target language polysemy and future directions such as transfer to real-world scenarios.

Towards Sense-level Bilingual Dictionary Induction

Suicide ideation detection models are typically evaluated using aggregate performance metrics, yet little is known about how they internally represent psychologically meaningful risk factors. In high-stakes mental health applications, understanding these internal representations is essential for safety, transparency, and responsible deployment. In this work, we move beyond accuracy and analyze how suicide detection models trained on original and topic-augmented datasets encode psychological risk factors in their internal representation space. Using visualization and geometric analysis, we examine the coherence and separability of topic-related features. Our results show that topic-aware augmentation increases the clarity and distinctness of underrepresented psychosocial risk factors such as immigration, family issues, and financial crisis. These findings suggest that augmentation not only improves model performance but also leads to more structured and interpretable internal representations.

Beyond Accuracy: Interpreting Topic Representation in Suicide Ideation Detection Models

Stance detection identifies whether a text expresses support, opposition, or neutrality toward a target and is central to applications such as political analysis and misinformation monitoring. With the shift toward large language models (LLMs), stance classification increasingly relies on prompting and lightweight adaptation. Yet the generalization behavior of open-source LLMs across new targets and domains remains uneven. We conduct a large-scale diagnostic study of four open-source LLMs (3B–24B parameters), examining how model size, prompting strategies, and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) interact across in-target, cross-target, and cross-domain settings. Across 912 experiments, three patterns emerge: (1) larger models improve prompting-based in-target performance, but this advantage diminishes after fine-tuning; (2) LoRA boosts in-target accuracy yet often harms cross-context transfer; (3) optimal prompting depends on model size. These results reveal a consistent tension between specialization and generalization, offering practical guidance for configuring LLM-based stance detection under transfer.

Diagnosing Generalization in Open-Source LLMs for Stance Detection

News headlines and summaries shape how events are interpreted through selective emphasis and omission, a phenomenon commonly referred to as framing. Large language models are now routinely used to generate such content, yet existing evaluation frameworks largely overlook this dimension. We introduce Frame In, Frame Out (FIFO), the first large-scale benchmark for measuring framing presence in LLM-generated news summaries, grounded in the widely used XSum dataset. FIFO combines 15,499 jury-annotated examples with 320 expert-labeled instances ($\kappa = 0.61$) to validate and calibrate model-based annotations. Using FIFO, we analyze measured framing rates across 27 summarization models. We find that LLM-generated summaries often exhibit higher calibrated framing rates than human-written references, with substantial variation across topics and training regimes, including elevated rates in scientific and public health summaries. Our results establish framing as an underexplored and consequential dimension of summarization quality.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Evaluating Adjective-Noun Compositionality in LLMs: Functional vs Representational Perspectives

Similar lecture

Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Evaluating Adjective-Noun Compositionality in LLMs: Functional vs Representational Perspectives

Similar lecture

Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events

Downloads