United States

Great novels create immersive worlds with rich character arcs, well-structured plots, and nuanced writing styles. 
However, current novel generation methods often rely on brief, simplistic story outlines and generate details using plain, generic language.
To bridge this gap, we introduce the task of $\textit{Imitative Novel Generation}$, which requires the generated novels to imitate the distinctive features of the original work, including understanding character profiles and world views, predicting plausible plot developments, and writing concrete details using vivid, expressive language.
To achieve this, we propose WriterAgent, a novel generation system designed to master the core aspects of literary imitative.
WriterAgent is trained through a curriculum learning paradigm, progressing from low-level stylistic mastery to high-level narrative coherence. 
Its key tasks include language style learning, character modeling, plot planning, and stylish writing, ensuring comprehensive narrative control.
To support this, WriterAgent leverages the WriterLoRA framework, an extension of LoRA with hierarchical and cumulative task-specific modules, each specializing in a different narrative aspect. 
We evaluate WriterAgent on multilingual classics like $\textit{Harry Potter}$ and $\textit{Dream of the Red Chamber}$, demonstrating its superiority over baselines in capturing the target author’s settings, character dynamics, and writing style to produce coherent, faithful narratives.
We hope this work inspires literary creativity in NLP: ${WriterAgent}$.

ACL 2026

 From Style to Story: A Curriculum Learning Approach for Imitative Novel Generation

The purpose of the AAAI conference is to promote research in artificial intelligence (AI) and scientific exchange among AI researchers, practitioners, scientists, and engineers in affiliated disciplines. 

AAAI 2021

poster

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. <br>
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) <br><br><br>
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>
<br><br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly being deployed as automated content moderators. Within this landscape, we uncover a critical threat: Adversarial Smuggling Attacks. Unlike adversarial perturbations (for misclassification) and adversarial jailbreaks (for harmful output generation), adversarial smuggling exploits the Human-AI capability gap. It encodes harmful content into human-readable visual formats that remain AI-unreadable, thereby evading automated detection and enabling the dissemination of harmful content. We classify smuggling attacks into two pathways: (1) Perceptual Blindness, disrupting text recognition; and (2) Reasoning Blockade, inhibiting semantic understanding despite successful text recognition. To evaluate this threat, we constructed SmuggleBench, the first comprehensive benchmark comprising 1,700 adversarial smuggling attack instances. Evaluations on SmuggleBench reveal that both proprietary (e.g., GPT-5) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-VL) SOTA models are vulnerable to this threat, producing Attack Success Rates (ASR) exceeding 90%. By analyzing the vulnerability through the lenses of perception and reasoning, we identify three root causes: the limited capabilities of vision encoders, the robustness gap in OCR, and the scarcity of domain-specific adversarial examples. We conduct a preliminary exploration of mitigation strategies, investigating the potential of test-time scaling (via CoT) and adversarial training (via SFT) to mitigate this threat.

Making MLLMs Blind: Adversarial Smuggling Attacks in MLLM Content Moderation

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated competitive performance in zero-shot multilingual machine translation (MT). Some follow-up works further improved MT performance via preference optimization, but they leave a key aspect largely underexplored: the order in which data samples are given during training. We address this topic by integrating curriculum learning into various state-of-the-art preference optimization algorithms to boost MT performance. We introduce a novel curriculum learning strategy with restarts (CLewR), which reiterates easy-to-hard curriculum multiple times during training to effectively mitigate the catastrophic forgetting of easy examples. We demonstrate consistent gains across several model families (Gemma2, Qwen2.5, Llama3.1) and preference optimization techniques. We publicly release our code at https://github.com/alexandra-dragomir/CLewR.

 CLewR: Curriculum Learning with Restarts for Machine Translation Preference Learning

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) enable sophisticated reasoning over images and videos, yet their inference is hindered by a systemic efficiency barrier known as visual token dominance. This overhead is driven by a multi-regime interplay between high-resolution feature extraction, quadratic attention scaling, and memory bandwidth constraints. We present a systematic taxonomy of efficiency techniques structured around the inference lifecycle, consisting of encoding, prefilling, and decoding. Unlike prior reviews focused on isolated optimizations, we analyze the end-to-end pipeline to reveal how upstream decisions dictate downstream bottlenecks, covering compute-bound visual encoding, the intensive prefilling of massive contexts, and the ''visual memory wall'' in bandwidth-bound decoding. By decoupling the efficiency landscape into the axes of shaping information density, managing long-context attention, and overcoming memory limits, this work provides a structured analysis of how isolated optimizations compose to navigate the trade-off between visual fidelity and system efficiency. The survey concludes by outlining four future frontiers supported by pilot empirical insights, including hybrid compression based on functional unit sensitivity, modality-aware decoding with relaxed verification, progressive state management for streaming continuity, and stage-disaggregated serving through hardware-algorithm co-design. The submitted software contains a snapshot of our literature repository, which is designed to be maintained as a living resource for the community.

Efficient Inference for Large Vision-Language Models: Bottlenecks, Techniques, and Prospects

Multi-agent systems utilizing large language models often assign authoritative roles to improve performance, yet the impact of authority bias on agent interactions remains underexplored. We present the first systematic analysis of role-based authority bias in free-form multi-agent evaluation using ChatEval. Applying French and Raven's power-based theory, we classify authoritative roles into legitimate, referent, and expert types and analyze their influence across 12-turn conversations. Experiments with GPT-4o and DeepSeek R1 reveal that Expert and Referent power roles exert stronger influence than Legitimate power roles. Crucially, authority bias emerges not through active conformity by general agents, but through authoritative roles consistently maintaining their positions while general agents demonstrate flexibility. Furthermore, authority influence requires clear position statements, as neutral responses fail to generate bias. These findings provide key insights for designing multi-agent frameworks with asymmetric interaction patterns.

 Belief in Authority: Impact of Authority in Multi-Agent Evaluation Framework

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as tool-using \emph{agents}, and existing methods for evaluating and optimizing tool usage by LLMs typically assume a static tool environment with fixed APIs and documentation. In practice, toolsets evolve as tools are added, changed, or deprecated, introducing instability for agents that must retain prior competence while adapting to new capabilities. We formalize this challenge as the stability--adaptation dilemma. To address it, we propose ContDa, a continual documentation adaptation framework that provides a generalizable solution to this problem, enabling LLM agents to self-evolve by updating tool documentation. ContDa combines relation-guided exploration, which leverages functionally related existing tools as anchors to probe and identify new tool capabilities, with relation-aware adjustment that organizes overlapping tools and explicitly encodes usage preferences and fallback options among them. We then introduce complementary metrics that disentangle performance from stability and adaptation. Experiments across three evolution patterns on dynamic extensions of StableToolBench and RestBench show that ContDa consistently improves average performance by enhancing the discovery of new capabilities while incurring only limited loss of previously solved tasks, demonstrating documentation adaptation as an effective and lightweight mechanism for robust tool use in evolving environments. Our code is available at https://github.com/Bingo-W/ContDa.

Beyond Static Toolsets: Self-Evolving LLM Tool Agents via Continual Documentation Adaptation

Current retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods struggle with complex multi-hop reasoning, relying on unstructured semantic matching that lacks the logical structure needed to systematically guide retrieval. We introduce Programmatic Retrieval Optimization with Generative Reasoning and Augmented Multi-queries (PROGRAM), a novel framework that elevates retrieval to structured, program-guided reasoning. PROGRAM treats retrieval as execution of specific program types, such as logical, temporal, causal, and so forth, through three stages of 'Program-Type Selection' with dual-metric optimization, 'Iterative Active Program Pruning' with evidence accumulation, and 'Final Answer Generation' with reranking. Evaluated on five benchmarks including HotPotQA, 2WikiMultihopQA, ARC-Challenge, MMLU-Pro, and MedQA with various LLMs, PROGRAM achieves state-of-the-art performance with up to 24% relative improvement on HotPotQA and 13.2% on MedQA over strong baselines including FLARE, ProbTree and Self-RAG.

PROGRAM: Programmatic Retrieval Optimization with Generative Reasoning and Augmented Multi-queries

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) allocate substantial inference-time compute to Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, improving performance on mathematics, scientific QA, and tool usage. However, this introduces overthinking: LRMs often reach a correct intermediate solution, continue reasoning, and overwrite it with an incorrect answer. We first demonstrate that oracle stopping—where we inject &lt;/think&gt; at every sentence boundary and select the best stopping point in hindsight—improves average accuracy by 8% while reducing thinking tokens by 72%, exposing substantial overthinking. Motivated by this finding, we propose ThinkBrake, which monitors the log-probability margin between the top continuation token and &lt;/think&gt; at sentence boundaries, stopping reasoning when this margin narrows. ThinkBrake requires no training and achieves favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-offs across math, scientific QA, and tool usage benchmarks, reducing thinking token usage by up to 30%. Furthermore, we provide theoretical analysis showing that ThinkBrake is equivalent to test-time realignment with a reward bonus for the &lt;/think&gt; token.

ThinkBrake: Efficient Reasoning via Log-Probability Margin Guided Decoding

Argumentation skills are an essential toolkit for large language models (LLMs). These skills are crucial in various use cases, including self-reflection, debating collaboratively for diverse answers, and countering hate speech. In this paper, we create the first benchmark for a standardized evaluation of LLM-based approaches to computational argumentation, encompassing 33 datasets from previous work in unified form. Using the benchmark, we evaluate the generalizability of five LLM families across 46 computational argumentation tasks that cover mining arguments, assessing perspectives, assessing argument quality, reasoning about arguments, and generating arguments. On the benchmark, we conduct an extensive systematic analysis of the contribution of few-shot examples, reasoning steps, model size, and training skills to the performance of LLMs on the computational argumentation tasks in the benchmark.

ArgBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Computational Argumentation Tasks

The inability to filter out in advance all potentially problematic data from the pre-training of large language models has given rise to the need for methods for unlearning specific pieces of knowledge after training. Existing techniques overlook the need for continuous and immediate action, causing them to suffer from degraded utility as updates accumulate and protracted exposure of sensitive information. To address these issues, we propose **C**ontinual **U**nlearning in **R**e**a**l **T**ime with **E**nsured Preservation of LLM Knowledge (**CURaTE**). Our method begins by training a sentence embedding model on a dataset designed to enable the formation of sharp decision boundaries for determining whether a given input prompt corresponds to any stored forget requests. The similarity of a given input to the forget requests is then used to determine whether to answer or return a refusal response. We show that even with such a simple approach, not only does **CURaTE** achieve more effective forgetting than existing methods, but by avoiding modification of the language model parameters, it also maintains near perfect knowledge preservation over any number of updates and is the only method capable of continual unlearning in real-time.

CURaTE: Continual Unlearning in Real Time with Ensured Preservation of LLM Knowledge

Reasoning-tuned LLMs utilizing long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) excel at single-answer tasks, yet their ability to model Human Label Variation—which requires capturing probabilistic ambiguity rather than resolving it—remains underexplored. We investigate this through systematic disentanglement experiments on distribution-based tasks, employing Cross-CoT experiments to isolate the effect of reasoning text from intrinsic model priors. We observe a distinct "decoupled mechanism": while CoT improves distributional alignment, final accuracy is dictated by CoT content (99% variance contribution), whereas distributional ranking is governed by model priors (over 80%). Step-wise analysis further shows that while CoT’s influence on accuracy grows monotonically during the reasoning process, distributional structure is largely determined by LLM’s intrinsic priors. These findings suggest that long CoT serves as a decisive LLM decision-maker for the top option but fails to function as a granular distribution calibrator for ambiguous tasks.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

Making MLLMs Blind: Adversarial Smuggling Attacks in MLLM Content Moderation

Similar lecture

Narrative Plan Generation with Self-Supervised Learning