United States

A defence opinion is an essential step in criminal proceedings, yet it has not been systematically formulated or evaluated as a specific LegalAI task. Grounded in legal principles and practice, we formulate this task as generating a structured defence opinion conditioned jointly on an indictment and the defendant’s stated opinion, which often present conflicting claims. We formalize this setting as a dual-perspective generation problem and introduce DefGen-Bench, a benchmark comprising several Chinese criminal cases with expert-reviewed reference defence opinions. We evaluate eight large language models (LLMs) on this task and observe that existing models tend to mirror the defendant’s opinion, thereby overlooking more appropriate defence strategies. To address this challenge, we propose Knowledge-Enhanced Highlighted Indictment (KHI), a legal knowledge–guided input enhancement method applicable to both open- and closed-source LLMs. Experiments demonstrate consistent improvements across all evaluated LLMs, validating the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

ACL 2026

DefGen-Bench: A Benchmark for Chinese Criminal Defence Opinion Generation in LegalAI

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. <br>
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) <br><br><br>
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>
<br><br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

technical paper

Large language model (LLM)‑based agents are increasingly deployed in e‑commerce shopping. To perform thorough, user‑tailored product searches, agents should interpret personal preferences, engage in multi‑turn dialogues, and ultimately retrieve and discriminate among highly similar products. However, existing research has yet to provide a unified simulation environment that consistently captures all of these aspects, and always focuses solely on evaluation benchmarks without training support. In this paper, we introduce ShopSimulator, a large‑scale and challenging Chinese shopping environment. Leveraging ShopSimulator, we evaluate LLMs across diverse scenarios, finding that even the best‑performing models achieve less than 40% full‑success rate. Error analysis reveals that agents struggle with deep search and product selection in long trajectories, fail to balance the use of personalization cues, and to effectively engage with users. Further training exploration provides practical guidance for overcoming these weaknesses, with the combination of supervised fine‑tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) yielding significant performance improvements.

ShopSimulator: Evaluating and Exploring RL-Driven LLM Agent for Shopping Assistants

Automated schedule generation for multitask from natural language descriptions has huge potential in modern industry. While classic methods bypass language complexities by using pre-formatted matrices, and recent LLM+solver approaches introduce new fragilities by relying on solver-specific code generation. This raises critical questions: Can large language models (LLMs) solve this NL $\Rightarrow$ Schedule task end-to-end well(RQ1)? If the answer is "no", where do they fall short(RQ2)? And how can their capabilities be enhanced (RQ3)? To answer these questions, we introduce NL $\Rightarrow$ Schedule, the first benchmark for this task, equipped with a dataset of 240 description-schedule pairs constructed from real-world materials and a rigorous evaluation suite. Our evaluation of nine state-of-the-art LLMs reveals the limitations of different LLMs in procedure grounding and the strengths of advanced LLMs in global planning via local analysis. To address these shortcomings, we propose Mans, a novel multi-agent framework. Extensive experiments show that Mans achieves more robust performance comparable to six state-of-the-art LLM+solver methods. We hope NL $\Rightarrow$ Schedule and Mans will serve as a solid foundation for automatic scheduling.

NL $\Rightarrow$ Schedule: Evaluate Multitask Scheduling Capability of Large Language Models

Large Language Models enhanced with Retrieval Augmented Generation show strong potential in knowledge intensive tasks. However, they often encounter knowledge conflicts, where retrieved information contradicts the model’s internal knowledge or exhibits internal inconsistencies. Existing methods treat this as a simplistic binary choice, forcing models to blindly trust external contexts or rigidly rely on memory, resulting in unreliable predictions that swing between sycophancy and stubbornness. We argue that a more principled approach is to embrace contradictions as opportunities for deeper reasoning. To this end, we introduce Debate-of-Thoughts (DoT), a framework that transforms conflict resolution into an active deliberation process. DoT guides a single model through three phases: 1) hypothesis generation, which forms competing perspectives; 2) internal debate, where the model acts as both a proponent and a critic to stress test each view; and 3) adjudication, where a judge module evaluates arguments based on evidence and logical consistency. We implement DoT via two complementary strategies: inference time prompt chaining and supervised fine tuning. Experiments across multiple conflict benchmarks show that DoT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, while generating transparent debate transcripts that explain its decisions. By improving both accuracy and interpretability under knowledge conflicts, DoT establishes a more reliable paradigm for retrieval augmented generation systems.

Debate-of-Thoughts: Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in LLMs Through Internal Deliberation

Retrieving coherent evidence subgraphs is critical for Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA). Existing paradigms often treat facts independently, rely on biased heuristics, or employ myopic search, failing to optimize collective subgraph utility. In this paper, we propose **COSMOS** (**C**onnectivity-**O**riented **S**ubmodular **M**aximization for **O**ptimal **S**ubgraph Retrieval), a unified framework that formalizes evidence retrieval as a constrained submodular maximization problem. This formulation mathematically captures the trade-off between information relevance and structural complexity. To tractably solve this combinatorial challenge, COSMOS employs a decompose-and-conquer strategy, which first performs a seed-guided greedy expansion to maximize local semantic utility, followed by a topology-aware component aggregation to bridge disjoint evidence clusters via Maximum Spanning Tree aggregation. Guided by theoretical bounds, we introduce Structure-Aware Contrastive Tuning to align semantic space with KG topology. Experimental results on WebQSP, CWQ, and $\text{M}^3\text{GQA}$ benchmarks demonstrate that COSMOS achieves state-of-the-art performance.

COSMOS: Connectivity-Oriented Submodular Maximization for Optimal Subgraph Retrieval

Contextual causal reasoning is a critical yet challenging capability for Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing benchmarks, however, often evaluate this skill in fragmented settings, failing to ensure context consistency or cover the full causal hierarchy. To address this, we pioneer METER to systematically benchmark LLMs across all three levels of the causal ladder under a unified context setting. Our extensive evaluation of various LLMs reveals a significant decline in proficiency as tasks ascend the causal hierarchy. To diagnose this degradation, we conduct a deep mechanistic analysis via both error pattern identification and internal information flow tracing. Our analysis reveals two primary failure modes: (1) LLMs are susceptible to distraction by causally irrelevant but factually correct information at lower level of causality; and (2) as tasks ascend the causal hierarchy, faithfulness to the provided context degrades, leading to a reduced performance. We belive our work advances our understanding of the mechanisms behind LLM contextual causal reasoning and establishes a critical foundation for future research. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/SCUNLP/METER.

METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models

While GUI agents have shown strong performance under explicit and completion instructions, real-world deployment requires aligning with users’ more complex implicit intents. In this work, we highlight Hierarchical Implicit Intent Alignment for Personalized GUI Agent (**PersonalAlign**), a new agent task that requires agents to leverage long-term user records as persistent context to resolve omitted preferences in vague instructions and anticipate latent routines by user state for proactive assistance. To facilitate this study, we introduce **AndroidIntent**, a benchmark designed to evaluate agents’ ability in resolving vague instructions and providing proactive suggestions through reasoning over long-term user records. We annotated 775 user-specific preferences and 215 routines from 20k long-term records across different users for evaluation. Furthermore, we introduce Hierarchical Intent Memory Agent (**HIM-Agent**), which maintains a continuously updating personal memory and hierarchically organizes user preferences and routines for personalization. Finally, we evaluate a range of GUI agents on AndroidIntent, including GPT-5, Qwen3-VL, and UI-TARS, further results show that HIM-Agent significantly improves both execution and proactive performance by 15.7% and 7.3%.

PersonalAlign: Hierarchical Implicit Intent Alignment for Personalized GUI Agent with Long-Term User-Centric Records

Code translation across multiple programming languages is essential yet challenging due to two vital obstacles: scarcity of parallel data paired with executable test oracles, and optimization imbalance when handling diverse language pairs. 
We propose BootTrans, a bootstrapping method that resolves both obstacles. Its key idea is to leverage the functional invariance and cross-lingual portability of test suites, adapting abundant pivot-language unit tests to serve as universal verification oracles for multilingual reinforcement learning (RL) training. Our method introduces a dual-pool architecture with seed and exploration pools to progressively expand training data via execution-guided experience collection.
Furthermore, we design a language-aware weighting mechanism that dynamically prioritizes harder translation directions based on relative performance across sibling languages, mitigating optimization imbalance. 
Extensive experiments on the HumanEval-X and TransCoder-Test benchmarks demonstrate substantial improvements over baseline LLMs across all translation directions, with ablation studies validating the effectiveness of both bootstrapping and weighting components.

Bootstrapping Code Translation with Weighted Multilanguage Exploration

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly shape public discourse, yet most evaluations of economic and political bias have focused on high-resource Western languages and contexts. This leaves a blind spots in low-resource, multilingual regions such as Pakistan, where linguistic identity is closely tied to regional, religious, and political ideologies. We present a systematic evaluation of political bias in 13 state-of-the-art LLMs across five Pakistani languages: Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto, and Balochi. Our framework integrates a culturally adapted Political Compass Test (PCT) with multi-level framing analysis, capturing both ideological stance (economic/social axes) and stylistic framing (content, tone, emphasis). The prompts are aligned with 11 socio-political themes specific to the Pakistani context. The results show that while LLMs significantly reflect liberal-left orientations consistent with Western training data, they exhibit more authoritarian framing in regional languages, highlighting language-conditioned ideological modulation. We also identify model-specific bias patterns in all languages. These findings show the need for culturally grounded multilingual bias examining frameworks in NLP. Code and dataset are available.

Framing Political Bias in Multilingual LLMs Across Pakistani Languages

Knowledge Bases (KBs) play a key role in various applications. As two representative KB-related tasks, knowledge base completion (KBC) and knowledge base question answering (KBQA) are closely related and inherently complementary with each other. Thus, it will be beneficial to solve the task of joint KBC and KBQA to make them reinforce each other. However, existing studies usually rely on the small language model (SLM) to enhance them jointly, and the large language model (LLM)'s strong reasoning ability is ignored. In this paper, by combining the strengths of the LLM with the SLM, we propose a novel framework JCQL, which can make these two tasks enhance each other in an iterative manner. To make KBC enhance KBQA, we augment the LLM agent-based KBQA model's reasoning paths by incorporating an SLM-trained KBC model as an action of the agent, alleviating the LLM's hallucination and high computational costs issue in KBQA. To make KBQA enhance KBC, we incrementally fine-tune the KBC model by leveraging KBQA's reasoning paths as its supplementary training data, improving the ability of the SLM in KBC. Extensive experiments over two public benchmark data sets demonstrate that JCQL surpasses all baselines for both KBC and KBQA tasks.

Joint Knowledge Base Completion and Question Answering by Combining Large Language Models and Small Language Models

Infographics are composite visual artifacts that combine data visualizations with textual and illustrative elements to communicate information. While recent text-to-image (T2I) models can generate aesthetically appealing images, their reliability in generating infographics remains unclear. Generated infographics may appear correct at first glance but contain easily overlooked issues, such as distorted data encoding or incorrect textual content. We present IGenBench, the first benchmark for evaluating the reliability of text-to-infographic generation, comprising 600 curated test cases spanning 30 infographic types. We design an automated evaluation framework that decomposes reliability verification into atomic yes/no questions based on a taxonomy of 10 question types. We employ multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to verify each question, yielding question-level accuracy (Q-ACC) and infographic-level accuracy (I-ACC). We comprehensively evaluate 10 state-of-the-art T2I models on IGenBench. Our systematic analysis reveals key insights for future model development: (i) a three-tier performance hierarchy with the top model achieving Q-ACC of 0.90 but I-ACC of only 0.49; (ii) data-related dimensions emerging as universal bottlenecks (e.g., Data Completeness: 0.21); and (iii) the challenge of achieving end-to-end correctness across all models.

Downloads

Next from ACL 2026

ShopSimulator: Evaluating and Exploring RL-Driven LLM Agent for Shopping Assistants

Similar lecture

LegalChainReasoner: Grounding Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation via Structured Legal Chains