Morocco

Commonsense reasoning (CSR) is a popular set of tasks used to evaluate large language model performance. However, what constitutes common sense might not apply to disabled people, leaving them out of AI progress by ignoring their identities. This paper investigates how datasets and models deal with disability in commonsense reasoning through a case study of three types of disabilities: autism, vision impairments, and long COVID. We first obtain annotations from disabled and non-disabled persons on n = 300 samples of three widely used CSR datasets (CommonsenseQA, Social IQA, Physical IQA) for ableism, which we define as entries in which gold labels assume a lack of disability, finding that 15% of entries contain ableism. Then, we investigate LLMs&#39; ability to flag ableism in CSR instances, and their flexibility to adapt to disability contexts---whether the CSR gold answer changes if the person is disabled. Our results show that the three LLMs tested have low sensitivity to human-detected ableism occurrences but still detect 5 to 25% of entries as ableist. Our findings call into question whether relying on such assumption-laden commonsense reasoning benchmarks risks leaving disabled people behind in the AI world.

EACL 2026

Common Sense or Ableism? Rethinking Commonsense Reasoning Through the Lens of Disability

disability

commonsense reasoning

bias

Truth and Responsibility
“Truth and Responsibility” is a call to reimagine anthropology to meet the demands of the present moment. The imperative to bear witness, take action, and be held accountable to the truths we write and circulate invites us to reflect on our responsibility in reckoning with disciplinary histories, harms, and possibilities. To whom are we giving evidence and toward what ends? For whom are we writing? To whom are we accountable, and in what ways? We are thrilled to announce the theme of the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting to be held in Baltimore, MD: Truth and Responsibility.

Many consider anthropology to be a holistic social science dedicated to cross-cultural understanding as a way to reduce bigotry and more fully comprehend “what it means to be human.” Others push against this readily circulated origin story, arguing that “human” remains a highly contested, political category—evident as the presumed set of rights and protections associated with the “human” continue to be stripped away violently in the communities in which some of us live and work. Which violent histories and epistemologies must anthropologists take responsibility for in telling truth(s) about the discipline’s development? How do the dual histories of settler colonialism and slavery continue to influence anthropological thought and practices? In these political times, how can anthropologists throughout the globe work to secure a capacious, progressive vision of the human? How might movements for anti-racism, decoloniality, queer liberation, and healing such as #BlackLivesMatter, #ProtectMaunaKea, and #MeToo push a future anthropology out of the ashes of the anthropological past? Finally, what are the limits and possibilities of the anthropological imagination?

Across subfields, we find truths in patterns of human behavior, language, evolution, and cultural worlds. Industry-positioned anthropologists do this by extending the boundaries of the discipline not as an administrative solution to job shortages but as a source of intervention and knowledge production. Increasingly, anthropologists who make use of the scientific method question how status and identity help to decide which facts come to represent truth. How might quantitative researchers use our methods to identify patterned truths, and what responsibility do we hold in challenging conventional wisdom about these patterns? What responsibility do we have to both our colleagues and larger publics, to push toward increased transparency and ethical grounding in our data collection, analysis, and presentation?

Pedagogy is a key medium for the communication of anthropological truths. Which (and whose) truths are foregrounded in our curricula? What are the possibilities for a liberatory pedagogy in a precarious, “post-truth” era? Conferences, museums, organizing spaces, and classrooms are sites where pedagogy and various forms of communication can help us interrogate the performativity of truth. How might anthropologists conceive of truth performances? Might visual, aural, and choreographic performances during AAA sessions offer anthropologists alternative genres for truth-telling and truth-making that provoke discussions about responsibility?

In accordance with the urgency of the year’s theme, the questions posed in this call for papers do not have easy answers. The hope is that those who submit proposals will take up these questions and engage in collective thinking and imagining about the truths we hold, the truths we challenge, and the responsibilities we bear in co-creating a free and more equitable world. All panel proposals should have a statement about how the panel has incorporated the goals of equity, diversity, and inclusion, and/or analysis of power.

Executive Session proposals have already been selected and speak directly to the theme “Truth and Responsibility.” To practice the critical reflexivity this call for papers invites, we asked that Executive Session submissions explicitly address the diversity of session participants, such as organizational/institutional affiliation, career stage, race, ethnicity, disability, sexuality, class, religion, national identity, and gender. Proposals for Executive Sessions that demonstrated a commitment to equity and inclusion and/or a clear analysis of power (i.e. anti-imperialist, anti-white supremacist, decolonial, anti-ableist, feminist, anti-transphobic, anti-xenophobic, etc) were given priority. We are excited to be in conversation with residents of the Baltimore region and look forward to the discussions, performances, and actions generated by the dynamic group of anthropologists attending the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting.

AAA Annual Meeting 2021

“Truth and Responsibility” is a call to reimagine anthropology to meet the demands of the present moment. The imperative to bear witness, take action, and be held accountable to the truths we write and circulate invites us to reflect on our responsibility in reckoning with disciplinary histories, harms, and possibilities. To whom are we giving evidence and toward what ends? For whom are we writing? To whom are we accountable, and in what ways? We are thrilled to announce the theme of the 2021 AAA Annual Meeting to be held in Baltimore, MD: Truth and Responsibility.

Commonsense reasoning (CSR) is a popular set of tasks used to evaluate large language model performance. However, what constitutes common sense might not apply to disabled people, leaving them out of AI progress by ignoring their identities. This paper investigates how datasets and models deal with disability in commonsense reasoning through a case study of three types of disabilities: autism, vision impairments, and long COVID. We first obtain annotations from disabled and non-disabled persons on n = 300 samples of three widely used CSR datasets (CommonsenseQA, Social IQA, Physical IQA) for ableism, which we define as entries in which gold labels assume a lack of disability, finding that 15% of entries contain ableism. Then, we investigate LLMs' ability to flag ableism in CSR instances, and their flexibility to adapt to disability contexts---whether the CSR gold answer changes if the person is disabled. Our results show that the three LLMs tested have low sensitivity to human-detected ableism occurrences but still detect 5 to 25% of entries as ableist. Our findings call into question whether relying on such assumption-laden commonsense reasoning benchmarks risks leaving disabled people behind in the AI world.

technical paper

#### *Message from the General Chair, Aline Villavicencio*
I’m delighted and honoured to welcome you to the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2026), taking place in the beautiful city of Rabat, in Morocco, in March 24-29, 2026. EACL is the flagship European conference of the Association and EACL 2026 proudly continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity. I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers whose dedication, generosity, and tireless efforts have made this conference possible.
For the first time EACL is being hosted in the African continent. This is an important milestone for our community, and we are grateful to our Moroccan hosts for enabling this historic moment by bringing this edition of EACL to Rabat. We are also delighted that the Second Arabic NLP School is co-located with EACL. We hope attendees enjoy this wonderful opportunity to strengthen ties with the Computational Linguistics communities across the African continent. *[Read full message](https://drive.google.com/file/d/14NlmHvwM6fPJuMmOvVh7K0vtQbEyv3SZ/view?usp=sharing)*<br><br>

<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://underline.io/events/522/reception','_blank')">Go to Workshops and Tutorials Program</button></html>
<br><br><br>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to EACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.eacl.org/registration/) first.

**Online Registration Form**: https://acl.swoogo.com/eacl2026

Registration Required

Welcome to the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). EACL 2026 will be held in Rabat, Morocco, from March 24–29, 2026. 

Large Language Models exhibit implicit personalities in their generation, but reliably controlling or aligning these traits to meet specific needs remains an open challenge. The need for effective mechanisms for behavioural manipulation of the model during generation is a critical gap in the literature that needs to be fulfilled. Personality-aware LLMs hold a promising direction towards this objective. However, the relationship between these psychological constructs and their representations within LLMs remains underexplored and requires further investigation. Moreover, it is intriguing to understand and study the use of these representations to steer the models' behaviour. We propose a novel pipeline that extracts hidden state activations from transformer layers using the Big Five Personality Traits (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism), which is a comprehensive and empirically validated framework to model human personality applies low-rank subspace discovery methods, and identifies trait-specific optimal layers across different model architectures for robust injection. The resulting personality-aligned directions are then operationalised through a flexible steering framework with dynamic layer selection, enabling precise control of trait expression in LLM outputs. Our findings reveal that personality traits occupy a low-rank shared subspace, and that these latent structures can be transformed into actionable mechanisms for effective steering through careful perturbations without impacting the fluency, variance and general capabilities, helping to bridge the gap between psychological theory and practical model alignment

Activation-Space Personality Steering: Hybrid Layer Selection for Stable Trait Control in LLMs

We find that correct-to-incorrect sycophancy signals are most linearly accessible within multi-head attention activations. Motivated by the linear representation hypothesis, we train linear probes across the residual stream, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and attention layers to analyze where these signals emerge. Although separability appears in the residual stream and MLPs, steering using these probes is most effective in a sparse subset of middle-layer attention heads. Using TruthfulQA as the base dataset, we find that probes trained on it transfer effectively to other factual QA benchmarks. Furthermore, comparing our discovered direction to previously identified “truthful” directions reveals limited overlap, suggesting that factual accuracy, and deference resistance, arise from related but distinct mechanisms. Attention-pattern analysis further indicates that the influential heads attend disproportionately to expressions of user doubt, contributing to sycophantic shifts. Overall, these findings suggest that sycophancy can be mitigated through simple, targeted linear interventions that exploit the internal geometry of attention activations. Code will be released upon publication.

Sycophancy Hides Linearly in the Attention Heads

Entity structure extraction, which aims to extract entities and their associated attributeвЂ“value structures from text, is an essential task for text understanding and knowledge graph construction. Existing methods based on large language models (LLMs) typically rely heavily on predefined entity attribute schemas or annotated datasets, often leading to incomplete extraction results. To address these challenges, we introduce ZOES, a novel approach to entity structure extraction that does not require any schema or annotated samples. ZOES operates via a principled mechanism of enrichment, refinement, and unification, based on the insight that an entity and its associated structure are mutually reinforcing. Experiments demonstrate that ZOES consistently enhances LLMs' ability to extract more complete entity structures across three different domains, showcasing both the effectiveness and generalizability of the method. These findings suggest that such an enrichment, refinement, and unification mechanism may serve as a principled approach to improving the quality of LLM-based entity structure discovery in various scenarios.

Zero-Shot Open-Schema Entity Structure Discovery

Dynamic web navigation is challenging due to infinite decision space and the constantly changing nature of cyberspace. Existing methods rely on greedy strategies or value estimation, struggle to achieve effective backtracking and are heavily dependent on proprietary models. In this paper, we propose HintNavigator, a cognitive multi-agent collaboration framework that enhances cyberspace exploration capability through In-Context Exploration (ICE). Inspired by human cognitive planning process, we categorize the interaction history into Declarative History (environment observations) and Procedural History (action trajectories) to enhance historical reflection capability. These dual-history streams are dynamically integrated through specialized cognitive agents, enabling effective self-directed backtracking guided by working memory consolidation. Experiments show that HintNavigator achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source LLM agents, surpassing proprietary model Claude-3.5 Sonnet on the WebArena benchmark.

Navigating the Infinite Dynamic Web Space: Effective In-Context Exploration via Cognitive Multi-Agent Collaboration

Knowledge editing (KE) has recently emerged as a promising technique to update specific facts in large language models (LLMs) without full retraining. While existing KE methods show promising results on general-domain benchmarks, their effectiveness in the medical domain remains largely unexplored. Medical knowledge editing poses unique challenges, requiring models not only to memorize new facts but also to internalize and generalize them for reliable and interpretable clinical decision-making. In this work, we propose MedEditBench, a rigorous evaluation framework for assessing medical knowledge editing. Our preliminary results reveal that current KE paradigm, which directly edits simple answers to the LLMs, often leads to superficial updates with poor generalization. To address this, we introduce Self-Generated Rationale Editing (SGR-Edit), which leverages model-generated rationales as editing targets, enabling deeper knowledge integration. Extensive experiments across diverse LLMs and KE methods demonstrate that SGR-Edit consistently improves editing efficacy and generalization. Furthermore, we examine the impact of sequential edits on in-domain medical knowledge, external-domain knowledge, as well as general model capabilities, offering practical insights for deploying KE in real-world medical applications.

Beyond Memorization: A Rigorous Evaluation Framework for Medical Knowledge Editing

Figurative language, particularly fixed figurative expressions (FFEs) such as idioms and proverbs, poses persistent challenges for large language models (LLMs). Unlike literal phrases, FFEs are culturally grounded, largely non-compositional, and conventionally fixed, making them especially vulnerable to figurative hallucination. We define figurative hallucination as the generation or endorsement of expressions that sound idiomatic and plausible but do not exist as authentic figurative expressions in the target language. We introduce FFEHallu, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating figurative hallucination in LLMs, with a focus on Persian, a linguistically rich yet underrepresented language. FFEHallu consists of 600 carefully curated instances spanning three complementary tasks: (i) FFE generation from meaning, (ii) detection of fabricated FFEs across four controlled construction categories, and (iii) FFE to FFE translation from English to Persian. Evaluating six state of the art multilingual LLMs, we find systematic weaknesses in figurative competence and cultural grounding. While models such as GPT4.1 demonstrate relatively strong performance in rejecting fabricated FFEs and retrieving authentic ones, most models struggle to reliably distinguish real expressions from high quality fabrications and frequently hallucinate during cross lingual translation. These findings reveal substantial gaps in current LLMs handling of figurative language and underscore the need for targeted benchmarks to assess and mitigate figurative hallucination.

FFE-Hallu: Hallucinations in Fixed Figurative Expressions: A Benchmark of Idioms and Proverbs in the Persian Language

We investigate to what extent Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can accurately identify the orientation of input images rotated 0В°, 90В°, 180В°, and 270В°. This task demands robust visual reasoning capabilities to detect rotational cues and contextualize spatial relationships within images regardless of their orientation. To evaluate MLLMs on these abilities, we introduce RotBench -- a 350-image manually-filtered benchmark comprised of lifestyle, portrait, and landscape images. Despite the relatively simple nature of this task, we show several state-of-the-art open and proprietary MLLMs do not reliably identify rotation in input images. Providing models with additional information -- including captions, segmentation maps, and more -- or using chain-of-thought prompting offers only small and inconsistent improvements. Our results indicate most models are able to reliably identify right-side up (0В°) images, while certain models are able to identify up-side down (180В°) images. None can reliably distinguish between 90В° and 270В°. Simultaneously showing the image rotated in different orientations leads to moderate performance gains in reasoning models, while a modified setup using voting improves performance in weaker models. We further show fine-tuning does not improve models' ability to distinguish 90В° and 270В°, despite substantially improving identification of 180В° images. Together, these results reveal a significant gap between MLLMs' spatial reasoning capabilities and human perception in identifying rotation.

RotBench: Evaluating Multi-modal Large Language Models on Identifying Image Rotation

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, ensuring their safety across multiple languages has become a critical concern. While LLMs demonstrate impressive capabilities in English, their safety mechanisms may not generalize effectively to other languages, leading to disparities in toxicity detection, bias mitigation, and harm prevention. This systematic review examines the multilingual safety of LLMs by synthesizing findings from recent studies that evaluate their robustness across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts beyond English language. Our review explores the methodologies used to assess multilingual safety, identifies challenges such as dataset availability and evaluation biases. Based on our analysis we highlight gaps in multilingual safety research and provide recommendations for future work. This review aims to contribute to the development of fair and effective safety mechanisms for LLMs across all languages. We provide the extracted data in an interactive Streamlit dashboard, enabling transparent access to the raw data and allowing for continuous updates.

Safety of Large Language Models Beyond English: A Systematic Literature Review of Risks, Biases, and Safeguards

With the advent of large language models (LLMs), it has become common practice for users to draft text and utilize LLMs to enhance its quality through paraphrasing. However, this process can sometimes result in the loss or distortion of the original intended meaning. Due to the human-like quality of LLM-generated text, traditional detection methods often fail, particularly when text is paraphrased to closely mimic original content. In response to these challenges, we propose a novel approach named SearchLLM, designed to identify LLM-paraphrased text by leveraging search engine capabilities to locate potential original text sources. By analyzing similarities between the input and regenerated versions of candidate sources, SearchLLM effectively distinguishes LLM-paraphrased content. SearchLLM is designed as a proxy layer, allowing seamless integration with existing detectors to enhance their performance. Experimental results across various LLMs demonstrate that SearchLLM consistently enhances the accuracy of recent detectors in detecting LLM-paraphrased text that closely mimics original content. Furthermore, SearchLLM also helps the detectors prevent paraphrasing attacks.

SearchLLM: Detecting LLM Paraphrased Text by Measuring the Similarity with Regeneration of the Candidate Source via Search Engine

We introduce the Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark (KCL), a benchmark designed to assess language models’ legal reasoning capabilities independently of domain-specific knowledge. KCL provides question-level supporting precedents, enabling a more faithful disentanglement of reasoning ability from parameterized knowledge. KCL consists of two components: (1) KCL-MCQA, multiple-choice problems of 283 questions with 1,103 aligned precedents, and (2) KCL-Essay, open-ended generation problems of 169 questions with 550 aligned precedents and 2,739 instance-level rubrics for automated evaluation. Our systematic evaluation of 30+ models shows large remaining gaps, particularly in KCL-Essay, and that reasoning-specialized models consistently outperform their general-purpose counterparts. We release all resources, including the benchmark dataset and evaluation code, at https: //github.com/lbox-kr/kcl

Downloads

Next from EACL 2026

Activation-Space Personality Steering: Hybrid Layer Selection for Stable Trait Control in LLMs

Similar lecture

How Do We Show Up for One Another?: Learning from Disability Justice and Anthropology in Conversation

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from EACL 2026

Activation-Space Personality Steering: Hybrid Layer Selection for Stable Trait Control in LLMs

Similar lecture

How Do We Show Up for One Another?: Learning from Disability Justice and Anthropology in Conversation

Downloads