India

We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit human-like cognitive patterns under four established frameworks from
psychology: Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), Framing Bias, Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), and Cognitive Dissonance. We evaluated several proprietary and open-source models using structured prompts and automated scoring. Our findings reveal that these models often produce coherent narratives, show susceptibility to positive framing, exhibit moral judgments aligned with Liberty/Oppression concerns, and demonstrate self-contradictions tempered by extensive rationalization. Such behaviors mirror human cognitive tendencies yet
are shaped by their training data and alignment methods. We discuss the implications for AI transparency, ethical deployment, and future
work that bridges cognitive psychology and AI safety.

IJCNLP-AACL 2025

AI Through the Human Lens: Investigating Cognitive Theories in Machine Psychology

machine psychology

llm evaluations

cognitive science

### Looking for Cogsci 2023? Please [click here](https://underline.io/events/405/reception) to switch to 2023 edition.


**Dear Colleagues,**

Welcome to the 43rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society! 

This year’s conference brings together the latest research from all Cognitive Science and also highlights this year’s theme **Comparative Cognition: Animal Minds.** 

The program features four plenary speakers: Friederike Range (University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna), Onur Güntürkün (Ruhr University Bochum), Julia Fischer (University of Göttingen), and Erich Jarvis (The Rockefeller University). The keynotes and invited symposia showcase the broad spectrum of ideas that encompass the conference theme of comparative cognition. 

Further, the program includes the Rumelhart Prize keynote presentation by Susan Goldin-Meadow (University of Chicago), and symposia to celebrate the winner of the Elman Prize: Wei Ji Ma (New York University), the Heineken Award winner Robert Zatorre (McGill University), and the Robert J. Glushko Dissertation Prizes session.

The program committee for CogSci 2021 received 1,025 submissions, including 710 full papers, 275 member abstracts, 8 publication-based talks, as well as 15 proposals for symposia, and 17 for workshops and tutorials. After a rigorous review process, the committee selected 152 papers for oral presentation and inclusion in the conference proceedings (14.8%), 332 papers for poster presentation and inclusion in the proceedings (32.4%), and 175 papers for poster presentation with inclusion of abstracts in the proceedings (17.1%) We also selected 275 submitted member abstracts. In addition, we accepted 6 publication-based talks, 12 symposia, and 9 workshops and tutorials to make for an exciting and inclusive program.

We hope that you enjoy the conference this year!<br><br>

**Your Program Chairs,**
![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/99984908caba5e6453e5fc5ba34f3507.jpg)

**Learn more about the Vienna Cognitive Science Hub at the University of Vienna, hosts of CogSci 2021**

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/464h1m3iU68" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

To review the proceedings for the conference or review the searchable program, please visit the [website](https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/program/).


CogSci 2021

The Cognitive Science Society brings together researchers from around the world who hold a common goal: understanding the nature of the human mind. The mission of the Society is to promote Cognitive Science as a discipline, and to foster scientific interchange among researchers in various areas of study, including Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, Anthropology, Psychology, Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Education. The Society is a non-profit professional organization and its activities include sponsoring an annual conference and publishing the journals Cognitive Science and TopiCS.

poster

### Welcome to IJCNLP-AACL 2025! 
<br>It is a great honor to host this joint conference in Mumbai, India, from December 20 to 24, 2025. The joint conferences of IJCNLP and AACL are organized with alternating leadership in the Asia-Pacific region. The event is run by the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (AFNLP) in odd years, and by AACL in even years, while it is organized solely by ACL when the annual ACL meeting is held in the region. This year, the conference is primarily organized by AFNLP.<br>
*Kentaro Inui
MBZUAI, UAE
General Chair, IJCNLP-AACL 2025*<br>
Read full message and download the Conference Handbook [**here**](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UTwxkAqSqI-GAoJC3wE1zZt5VP1Y8GX0/view?usp=sharing).
<br><br><br><br>

The 14th IJCNLP & 4th AACL will be held in Mumbai, India from December 20th to December 24th, 2025.

Developing effective healthcare dialog systems requires controlling conversations to offer clear insight into the system’s understanding and to address the lack of patient-oriented conversational datasets. Moreover, evaluating these systems is equally challenging and requires user studies for robust evaluation. These challenges are even more pronounced when addressing the needs of minority populations with low health literacy and numeracy. This thesis proposal focuses on designing conversational architectures that deliver self-care information to African American patients with heart failure.

Neuro-symbolic approaches provide a promising direction by integrating symbolic reasoning with the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). In this proposal, we explore various approaches to creating a hybrid dialog model by combining the strengths of task-oriented dialog systems with the integration of neuro-symbolic rules into a Language Model (LM)/LLM-based dialog system, thereby controlling the dialog system. We propose a hybrid conversational system that uses schema graphs to control the flow of dialogue, while leveraging LLMs to generate responses grounded in these schemas. We will also conduct a user study to evaluate the system's effectiveness.

Thesis Proposal: A NeuroSymbolic Approach to Control Task-Oriented Dialog Systems

Improving the performance of neural machine translation for low-resource languages is challenging due to the limited availability of parallel corpora. However, recently available Large Language Models (LLM) have demonstrated superior performance in various natural language processing tasks, including translation. In this work, we propose to incorporate an LLM into a Machine Translation (MT) model as a prior distribution to leverage its translation capabilities. The LLM acts as a teacher, instructing the student MT model about the target language. We conducted an experiment in four language pairs: English ⇔ German and English ⇔ Hindi. This resulted in improved BLEU and COMET scores in a low-resource setting.

Enriching the Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation with Large Language Model

Large language models have the potential to generate explanations for their own predictions in a variety of styles based on user instructions. Recent research has examined whether these self-explanations faithfully reflect the models' actual behavior and has found that they often lack faithfulness. However, the question of how to improve faithfulness remains underexplored. Moreover, because different explanation styles have superficially distinct characteristics, it is unclear whether improvements observed in one style also arise when using other styles. This study analyzes the effects of training for faithful self-explanations and the extent to which these effects generalize, using three classification tasks and three explanation styles. We construct one-word constrained explanations that are likely to be faithful using a feature attribution method, and use these pseudo-faithful self-explanations for continual learning on instruction-tuned models. Our experiments demonstrate that training can improve self-explanation faithfulness across all classification tasks and explanation styles, and that these improvements also show signs of generalization to the multi-word settings and to unseen tasks. Furthermore, we find consistent cross-style generalization among three styles, suggesting that training may contribute to a broader improvement in faithful self-explanation ability.

Investigating Training and Generalization in Faithful Self-Explanations of Large Language Models

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, their effectiveness seem to be heavily biased toward high-resource languages. This proposal aims to address this gap by developing efficient training strategies for low-resource languages. We propose various techniques for efficient learning in simluated low-resource settings for English. We then plan to adapt these methods for low-resource languages. We plan to experiment with both natural language generation and understanding models. We evaluate the models on similar benchmarks as the BabyLM challenge for English. For other languages, we plan to use treebanks and translation techniques to create our own silver test set to evaluate the low-resource LMs.

Thesis Proposal: Efficient Methods for Natural Language Generation/Understanding Systems

Most models struggle with deception detection in diplomatic conversations due to extreme class imbalance and a lack of "social awareness" in how speakers and listeners are represented. To our end, we present CORAL (COntextual Representation and Asymmetric Learning), a model that learns socially-aware representations—capturing both speaker behavioral traits and their power differentials (social hierarchy)—and couples them with a principled learning framework designed to handle deception’s rarity. CORAL constructs embeddings that capture two key social signals: stable speaker traits through learned signatures and dynamic interaction contexts through power differentials. These embeddings form the input to a classifier trained with a Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning objective, designed for the asymmetric nature of deception (rare lies versus abundant, unlabeled truths). By synergizing representation and learning, CORAL achieves a state-of-the-art Macro F1-score of 0.65 on the highly imbalanced Peskov Diplomacy dataset, surpassing models that tackle these challenges in isolation. Our findings highlight that advancing socially complex NLP tasks requires aligning richer representations with objectives tailored to data asymmetry.

CORAL: A Synergistic Approach to Deception Detection with Socially-Aware Representations and Positive-Unlabeled Learning

The relationship between tokenizer algorithm (e.g., Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE), Unigram), morphological alignment, tokenization quality (e.g., compression efficiency), and downstream performance remains largely unclear, particularly for languages with complex morphology. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of tokenizers using small-sized BERT models---from pre-training through fine-tuning---for Telugu (agglutinative), along with preliminary evaluation in Hindi (primarily fusional with some agglutination) and English (fusional). To evaluate morphological alignment of tokenizers in Telugu, we create a dataset containing gold morpheme segmentations of 600 derivational and 7000 inflectional word forms.

Our experiments reveal two key findings for Telugu. First, the choice of tokenizer algorithm is the most significant factor influencing performance, with Unigram-based tokenizers consistently outperforming BPE across most settings. Second, while better morphological alignment shows a moderate, positive correlation with performance on text classification and structure prediction tasks, its impact is secondary to the tokenizer algorithm. Notably, hybrid approaches that use morphological information for pre-segmentation significantly boost the performance of BPE, though not Unigram. Our results further showcase the need for comprehensive intrinsic evaluation metrics for tokenizers that could explain downstream performance trends consistently.

Rethinking Tokenization for Rich Morphology: The Dominance of Unigram over BPE and Morphological Alignment

Semantic role labeling (SRL) is a fundamental task in natural language processing that is crucial for achieving deep semantic understanding. Despite the success of large language models (LLMs) in several downstream NLP tasks, key tasks such as SRL remain a challenge for LLMs. Hence, in this study, we attempt to instantiate the efficacy of LLMs for the task of SRL via Question answering. Toward that goal, we investigate the effectiveness of five different LLMs (Llama, Mistral, Qwen, OpenChat, Gemini) using zero-shot and few-shot prompting. Our findings indicate that few-shot prompting enhances the performance of all models. Although Gemini outperformed others by a margin of 11%, Qwen and Llama are not too far behind. Additionally, we conduct a comprehensive error analysis to shed light on the cases where LLMs fail. This study offers valuable insights into the performance of LLMs for structured prediction and the effectiveness of simple prompting techniques in the Question-Answering framework for SRL.

Are LLMS Good for Semantic Role Labeling via Question Answering?: A Preliminary Analysis

Sarcasm is a specific form of ironic speech which can often be hard to understand for language models due to its nuanced nature. Recent improvements in the ability of such models to detect and generate sarcasm motivate us to try a new approach to help language models perceive sarcasm as a speech style, through a human cognitive perspective. In this work, we propose a multi-hop Chain of Thought (CoT) methodology to understand the context of an utterance that follows a dialogue and to perform bidirectional style transfer on that utterance, leveraging the Theory of Mind. We use small language models (SLMs) due to their cost-efficiency and fast response-time. The generated utterances are evaluated using both LLM-as-a-judge and human evaluation, suitable to the open-ended and stylistic nature of the generations. Along with these, we also evaluate scores of automated metrics such as DialogRPT, BLEU and SBERT; drawing valuable insights from them that support our evidence. Based on this, we find that our cognitive approach to sarcasm is an effective way for language models to stylistically understand and generate sarcasm with better authenticity.

Could you BE more sarcastic? A Cognitive Approach to Bidirectional Sarcasm Understanding in Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) often hallucinate, generating nonsensical or false information that can be especially harmful in sensitive fields such as medicine or law. To study this phenomenon systematically, we introduce FalseCite, a curated dataset designed to capture and benchmark hallucinated responses induced by misleading or fabricated citations. Running GPT-4o-mini, Falcon-7B, and Mistral 7-B through FalseCite, we observed a noticeable increase in hallucination activity for false claims with deceptive citations, especially in GPT-4o-mini. Using the responses from FalseCite, we can also analyze the internal states of hallucinating models, visualizing and clustering the hidden state vectors. From this analysis, we noticed that the hidden state vectors, regardless of hallucination or non-hallucination, tend to trace out a distinct horn-like shape. Our work underscores FalseCite’s potential as a foundation for evaluating and mitigating hallucinations in future LLM research.

Visualizing and Benchmarking LLM Factual Hallucination Tendencies via Internal State Analysis and Clustering

Emotional prompting—the use of specific emotional diction in prompt engineering—has shown increasing promise in improving large language model (LLM) performance, truthfulness, and responsibility, however these studies have been limited to single types of positive emotional stimuli and have not considered varying degrees of emotion intensity in their analyses. In this paper, we explore the effects of four distinct emotions—joy, encouragement, anger, and insecurity—in emotional prompting and evaluate them on accuracy, sycophancy, and toxicity. We develop a prompt-generation pipeline with GPT-4o mini to create a suite of LLM and human-generated prompts with varying intensities across the four emotions. Then, we compile a "Gold Dataset" of prompts where human and model labels align. Our empirical evaluation on LLM behavior suggests that positive emotional stimuli lead to more accurate and less toxic results, but also increase sycophantic behavior.

Downloads

Next from IJCNLP-AACL 2025

Thesis Proposal: A NeuroSymbolic Approach to Control Task-Oriented Dialog Systems

Similar lecture

How hard is cognitive science?

.css-70qvj9{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}Downloads

Next from IJCNLP-AACL 2025

Thesis Proposal: A NeuroSymbolic Approach to Control Task-Oriented Dialog Systems

Similar lecture

How hard is cognitive science?

Downloads