China

Humans acquire syntactic constructions like filler–gap dependencies from limited and often noisy input. Can neural language models do the same? We investigate this question by evaluating GPT-2 models trained on child-directed input from the BabyLM Challenge. Our experiments focus on whether these “baby” language models acquire filler–gap dependencies, generalize across constructions, and respect structural constraints such as island effects. We apply a suite of syntactic constructions to four models trained on child language, including two base models (trained on 10M and 100M tokens) and two well-performing models from the BabyLM Challenge (ConcreteGPT and BabbleGPT). We evaluate model behavior using wh-licensing scores, flip tests, and grammaticality contrasts across four constructions. Results show that BabyLM-scale models partially acquire filler–gap dependencies but often fail to generalize or fully capture island constraints.

EMNLP 2025

Mind the Gap: How BabyLMs Learn Filler-Gap Dependencies

filler-gap dependencies

babylm

language acquisition

syntax

It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026), held in San Diego, California, USA, July 2–7, 2026. ACL 2026 continues our fields tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.

It is exciting to see the many developments in the field reflected at our conference, such as the advancement of large language models (born out of our community) into many application directions. This is not without challenges, partly due to unsolved problems, and partly due to misuse of the technology. All this is reflected well at ACL 2026. The conference also reflects that the field is not only about advancing technology, but also the science of fundamentally understanding language and how it is use by many different speaker communities. 
[Full Message from General Chair Philipp Koehn](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing) 
<html><button style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; white-space: nowrap; border-radius: 9999px; font-weight: bold; background: #7c3aed; color: white; font-family: 'Space Grotesk', sans-serif; height: 40px; font-size: 16px; padding: 0 20px; border: none; cursor: pointer" onclick="window.open('https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiJFOmMjvDgsDo3i1XzlQnImxe3RU_Cy/view?usp=sharing')">Conference Handbook</button></html>

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline - subject line "Welcome to ACL 2026". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

To access this event page, you are required to register.
Please complete your registration to continue.

We recommend reading [**the registration information**](https://2026.aclweb.org/registration/) first.

Registration Required

ACL 2026

The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) will take place in San Diego, California, from July 2 - 7, 2026.

technical paper

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community." 

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Multimodal misinformation, encompassing textual, visual, and cross-modal distortions, poses an increasing societal threat that is amplified by generative AI. Existing methods typically focus on a single type of distortion and struggle to generalize to unseen scenarios. In this work, we observe that different distortion types share common reasoning capabilities while also requiring task-specific skills. We hypothesize that joint training across distortion types facilitates knowledge sharing and enhances the model’s ability to generalize. To this end, we introduce TRUST-VL, a unified and explainable vision-language model for general multimodal misinformation detection. TRUST-VL incorporates a novel Question-Aware Visual Amplifier module, designed to extract task-specific visual features. To support training, we also construct TRUST-Instruct, a large-scale instruction dataset containing 198K samples featuring structured reasoning chains aligned with human fact-checking workflows. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and zero-shot benchmarks demonstrate that TRUST-VL achieves state-of-the-art performance, while also offering strong generalization and interpretability.

TRUST-VL: An Explainable News Assistant for General Multimodal Misinformation Detection

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, but often suffer from verbose outputs, increasing computational overhead. Existing fine-tuning-based compression methods either operate post-hoc pruning, risking disruption to reasoning coherence, or rely on sampling-based selection, which fails to remove redundant content thoroughly. To address these limitations, this work begins by framing two key patterns of redundant reflection in LRMs—textitConfidence Deficit, wherein the model reflects on correct intermediate steps, and textitTermination Delay, where reflection continues after a verified, confident answer—through a confidence-guided perspective. Based on this, we introduce textbfConCISE (textbfConfidence-guided textbfCompression textbfIn textbfStep-by-step textbfEfficient Reasoning), a framework designed to generate concise reasoning chains, integrating textitConfidence Injection to boost reasoning confidence, and textitEarly Stopping to terminate reasoning when confidence is sufficient. Extensive experiments demonstrate that compared to baseline methods, fine-tuning LRMs on textbfConCISE-generated data yields a better balance between compression and task performance, reducing length by up to ～50\% under SimPO, while maintaining high task accuracy.

ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning

Understanding the underlying argumentative flow in analytic argumentative writing is essential for discourse comprehension, especially in complex argumentative discourse such as think-tank commentary. However, existing structure modeling approaches often rely on surface-level topic segmentation, failing to capture the author’s rhetorical intent and reasoning process. To address this limitation, we propose a Question-Focus discourse structuring framework that explicitly models the underlying argumentative flow by anchoring each argumentative unit to a guiding question (reflecting the author’s intent) and a set of attentional foci (highlighting analytical pathways). To assess its effectiveness, we introduce an argument reconstruction task in which the modeled discourse structure guides both evidence retrieval and argument generation. We construct a high-quality dataset comprising 600 authoritative Chinese think-tank articles for experimental analysis. To quantitatively evaluate performance, we propose two novel metrics: (1) Claim Coverage, measuring the proportion of original claims preserved or similarly expressed in reconstructions, and (2) Evidence Coverage, assessing the completeness of retrieved supporting evidences. Experimental results show that our framework uncovers the author’s argumentative logic more effectively and offers better structural guidance for reconstruction, yielding up to a 10\% gain in claim coverage and outperforming strong baselines across both curated and LLM-based metrics.

Uncovering Argumentative Flow: A Question-Focus Discourse Structuring Framework

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated significant potential for addressing complex tasks through mechanisms such as chain-of-thought reasoning and tool invocation. However, current frameworks lack explicit supervision during the reasoning process, which may lead to error propagation across reasoning chains and hinder the optimization of intermediate decision-making stages. This paper introduces a novel framework, AgentPro, which enhances LLM agent performance by automated process supervision. AgentPro employs Monte Carlo Tree Search to automatically generate step-level annotations, and develops a process reward model based on these annotations to facilitate fine-grained quality assessment of reasoning. By employing a rejection sampling strategy, the LLM agent dynamically adjusts generation probability distributions to prevent the continuation of erroneous paths, thereby improving reasoning capabilities. Extensive experiments on four datasets indicate that our method significantly outperforms existing agent-based LLM methods (e.g., achieving a 6.32% increase in accuracy on the HotpotQA dataset), underscoring its proficiency in managing intricate reasoning chains.

AgentPro: Enhancing LLM Agents with Automated Process Supervision

We introduce Grade School Math with Distracting Context (GSM-DC), a synthetic benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) reasoning robustness against systematically controlled irrelevant context (IC). GSM-DC constructs symbolic reasoning graphs with precise distractor injections, enabling rigorous, reproducible evaluation. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs are significantly sensitive to IC, affecting both reasoning path selection and arithmetic accuracy. Additionally, training models with strong distractors improves performance in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scenarios. We further propose a stepwise tree search guided by a process reward model, which notably enhances robustness in out-of-distribution conditions.

How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled Benchmark

In-Context Learning (ICL) has become a powerful paradigm that enables LLMs to perform a wide range of tasks without task-specific fine-tuning. However, the effectiveness of ICL heavily depends on the quality of exemplar selection. In particular, for structured prediction tasks such as semantic parsing, existing ICL selection strategies often overlook structural alignment, leading to suboptimal performance and poor generalization. To address this issue, we propose a novel two-stage exemplar selection strategy that achieves a strong balance between efficiency, generalizability, and performance. First, we fine-tune a BERT-based retriever using structure-aware supervision, guiding it to select exemplars that are both semantically relevant and structurally aligned. Then, we enhance the retriever with a plug-in module, which amplifies syntactically meaningful information in the hidden representations. This plug-in is model-agnostic, requires minimal overhead, and can be seamlessly integrated into existing pipelines. Experiments on four benchmarks spanning three semantic parsing tasks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines with multiple recent LLMs as inference-time models.

STARE at the Structure: Steering ICL Exemplar Selection with Structural Alignment

Large language models (LLMs) are no longer just language generators—they are increasingly used to simulate human behavior, perspectives, and demographic variation across social domains, from public opinion surveys to experimental research. Amid this shift, the use of LLMs to simulate historical narratives has emerged as a timely frontier. It is crucial to scrutinize the asymmetries these models embed when framing, interpreting, and retelling the past. Building on prior work that defines caricature as the combination of individuation and exaggeration, we analyze LLM-generated responses across 197 historically significant events—each featuring a directly and an indirectly affected persona. We find that LLMs reliably distinguish persona-based responses from neutral baselines, and that directly affected personas consistently exhibit higher exaggeration—amplifying identity-specific portrayals. Beyond lexical patterns, personas often frame the same event in conflicting ways—especially in military, political, and morally charged contexts. Grammatical analysis further reveals that direct personas adopt more passive constructions in institutional contexts, but shift to active framing when emotional immediacy is foregrounded. Our findings show how subtle asymmetries in tone, stance, and emphasis—not overt toxicity—can quietly, yet systematically, distort how history is told and remembered.

Who Holds the Pen? Caricature and Perspective in LLM Retellings of History

We introduce a set of training-free ABX-style discrimination tasks to evaluate how multilingual language models represent language identity (form) and semantic content (meaning). Inspired from speech processing, these zero-shot tasks measure whether minimal differences in representation can be reliably detected. This offers a flexible and interpretable alternative to probing. Applied to XLM-R (Conneau et al, 2020) across pretraining checkpoints and layers, we find that language discrimination declines over training and becomes concentrated in lower layers, while meaning discrimination strengthens over time and stabilizes in deeper layers. We then explore probing tasks, showing some alignment between our metrics and linguistic learning performance. Our results position ABX tasks as a lightweight framework for analyzing the structure of multilingual representations.

Discriminating Form and Meaning in Multilingual Models with Minimal-Pair ABX Tasks

Spatial reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence. One key concept in spatial cognition is the Frame of Reference (FoR), which identifies the perspective of spatial expressions. Despite its significance, FoR has received limited attention in AI models that need spatial intelligence. There is a lack of dedicated benchmarks and in-depth evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in this area. To address this issue, we introduce the Frame of Reference Evaluation in Spatial Reasoning Tasks (FoREST) benchmark, designed to assess FoR comprehension in LLMs. We evaluate LLMs on answering questions that require FoR comprehension and layout generation in text-to-image models using FoREST. Our results reveal a notable performance gap across different FoR classes in various LLMs, affecting their ability to generate accurate layouts for text-to-image generation. This highlights critical shortcomings in FoR comprehension. To improve FoR understanding, we propose Spatial-Guided prompting, which improves LLMs’ ability to extract essential spatial concepts. Our proposed method improves overall performance across spatial reasoning tasks.

FoREST: Frame of Reference Evaluation in Spatial Reasoning Tasks

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly power car assistants, enabling natural language interaction for tasks such as maintenance, troubleshooting, and operational guidance. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves grounding using vehicle manuals, evaluating response quality remains a key challenge. Traditional metrics like BLEU and ROUGE fail to capture critical aspects such as factual accuracy and information coverage. We propose GEAR, a fully automated, reference-based evaluation framework for car assistant systems. GEAR uses LLMs as evaluators to compare assistant responses against ground-truth counterparts, assessing coverage, correctness, and other dimensions of answer quality. To enable fine-grained evaluation, both responses are decomposed into key facts and labeled as essential, optional, or safety-critical using LLMs. The evaluator then determines which of these facts are correct and covered. Experiments show that GEAR aligns closely with human annotations, offering a scalable and reliable solution for evaluating car assistants.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

TRUST-VL: An Explainable News Assistant for General Multimodal Misinformation Detection

Similar lecture

Filling in the Mechanisms: How do LMs Learn Filler-Gap Dependencies under Developmental Constraints?