China

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have extended the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by enabling audio-based human interactions. However, recent research has revealed that LALMs remain vulnerable to harmful queries due to insufficient safety-alignment. Despite advances in defence measures for text and vision LLMs, effective safety-alignment strategies and audio-safety dataset specifically targeting LALMs are notably absent. Meanwhile defence measures based on Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) struggle to address safety improvement while avoiding over-rejection issues, significantly compromising helpfulness. In this work, we propose an unsupervised safety-fine-tuning strategy as remedy that reshapes model&#39;s representation space to enhance existing LALMs safety-alignment while balancing the risk of over-rejection. Our experiments, conducted across three generations of Qwen LALMs, demonstrate that our approach significantly improves LALMs safety under three modality input conditions (audio-text, text-only, and audio-only) while increasing over-rejection rate by only 0.88% on average. Warning: this paper contains harmful examples.

EMNLP 2025

Reshaping Representation Space to Balance the Safety and Over-rejection in Large Audio Language Models

large audio language models

over-rejection

safety and alignment

audio lmms

fine-tuning

### Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Welcome to the 2025 meeting of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics! I am proud to help organize the first NAACL conference to carry the new name of our organization, one that emphasizes inclusion for all of the Americas. I am also pleased to welcome you to Albuquerque, New Mexico, a state whose unique blend of cultural influences will make for an excellent backdrop for NAACL 2025, especially with this year’s special theme on NLP in a Multicultural World. 
**[Continue reading...](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jX-qGhqVSZZCIrAnJaz798pflu5Irrdn/view?usp=sharing)**

*- Colin Cherry, Google, NAACL 2025 General Chair* 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/b087f8a4dc5816d6e1a6514e59c59ac3.png)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T96GzPqObXrMln2BMByCSXTSizjTg69P/view?usp=sharing)

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in to explore this event.

To access NAACL 2025 event page you are required to register. Please follow [**this link**](https://2025.naacl.org/registration/registration/) to register. Access will depend on your registration type.

Please register!

NAACL 2025

Welcome to 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have extended the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by enabling audio-based human interactions. However, recent research has revealed that LALMs remain vulnerable to harmful queries due to insufficient safety-alignment. Despite advances in defence measures for text and vision LLMs, effective safety-alignment strategies and audio-safety dataset specifically targeting LALMs are notably absent. Meanwhile defence measures based on Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) struggle to address safety improvement while avoiding over-rejection issues, significantly compromising helpfulness. In this work, we propose an unsupervised safety-fine-tuning strategy as remedy that reshapes model's representation space to enhance existing LALMs safety-alignment while balancing the risk of over-rejection. Our experiments, conducted across three generations of Qwen LALMs, demonstrate that our approach significantly improves LALMs safety under three modality input conditions (audio-text, text-only, and audio-only) while increasing over-rejection rate by only 0.88% on average. Warning: this paper contains harmful examples.

technical paper

## Welcome!
"I am excited to welcome you to this year’s edition of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing! Importantly, it marks the 30th edition of EMNLP. With over 8,000 submissions, more than 3,000 accepted papers, and thousands of attendees, we have come a long way from that first
workshop, which had 14 accepted papers. As the field looks ahead, Suzhou is the fitting location for celebrating this milestone: rooted in a long literary tradition, yet modern and forward-looking, and home to a large share of the NLP community." 

*Message from the General Chair, Dirk Hovy*

Celebrate 30 Years of EMNLP! 
EMNLP 2025 will be held in Suzhou, China from November 5th to November 9th, 2025.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) in solving complex tasks. However, its autoregressive paradigm leads to significant computational overhead, hindering its deployment in latency-sensitive applications. To address this, we propose **DART** (**D**istilling **A**utoregressive **R**easoning to Silent **T**hought), a self-distillation framework that enables LLMs to replace autoregressive CoT with non-autoregressive Silent Thought (ST). Specifically, DART introduces two training pathways: the CoT pathway for traditional reasoning and the ST pathway for generating answers directly from a few ST tokens. The ST pathway utilizes a lightweight Reasoning Evolvement Module (REM) to align its hidden states with the CoT pathway, enabling the ST tokens to evolve into informative embeddings. During inference, only the ST pathway is activated, leveraging evolving ST tokens to deliver the answer directly. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that DART achieves comparable reasoning performance to existing baselines while offering significant efficiency gains, serving as a feasible alternative for efficient reasoning.

DART: Distilling Autoregressive Reasoning to Silent Thought

Large language models (LLMs) often achieve high performance in native language identification (NLI) benchmarks by leveraging superficial contextual cues such as names, locations, and cultural stereotypes, rather than the underlying linguistic patterns indicative of native language (L1) influence. To improve robustness, previous work has instructed LLMs to disregard such clues. In this work, we demonstrate that this strategy is unreliable and predictions can be easily altered by misleading hints. To address this problem, we introduce an agentic NLI pipeline inspired by forensic linguistics, where specialized agents accumulate and categorize diverse linguistic evidence before a final overall assessment. A goal-aware coordinating agent then synthesizes this evidence to make the NLI prediction. On two benchmark datasets, our approach significantly enhances NLI robustness and performance consistency against misleading contextual cues compared to standard prompting methods.

 Robust Native Language Identification through Agentic Decomposition

Integrating external tools with Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for accomplishing complex tasks. Since LLMs still struggle to effectively manage large tool collections, researchers have begun exploring retrieval-based methods to pre-select the most relevant options, addressing input length and latency constraints. However, existing retrievers are often misaligned with tool-calling LLMs due to their separate training processes. This paper presents PORTS, a novel odds ratio preference optimization method for training retrievers aimed at tool selection. Using a perplexity-inspired preference signal from a frozen LLM, our approach fine-tunes a retriever to find helpful tools by optimizing the correlation between the selection probabilities and the downstream performances while jointly enforcing a contrastive semantic loss between documentation strings. The versatility of PORTS and its ability to significantly improve tool selection accuracy are demonstrated through extensive experiments on six datasets, two encoder models, and three LLMs with diverse prior knowledge. With low computational demands, our alignment process facilitates generalization to new queries and tools, proving valuable for practical applications with evolving toolsets.

PORTS: Preference-Optimized Retrievers for Tool Selection with Large Language Models

Language use is shaped by pragmatics; i.e., reasoning about communicative goals and norms in context. As language models (LMs) are increasingly used as conversational agents, it becomes ever more important to understand their pragmatic reasoning abilities. We propose an evaluation framework derived from \textit{Wavelength}, a popular communication game where a speaker and a listener communicate about a broad range of concepts in a granular manner. We study a range of LMs on both language comprehension and language production using direct and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, and further explore a Rational Speech Act (RSA) approach to incorporating Bayesian pragmatic reasoning into LM inference. We find that state-of-the-art LMs, but not smaller ones, achieve strong performance on language comprehension, obtaining similar-to-human accuracy and exhibiting high correlations with human judgments even without CoT prompting or RSA. On language production, CoT can outperform direct prompting, and using RSA provides significant improvements over both approaches. Our study helps identify the strengths and limitations in LMs' pragmatic reasoning abilities and demonstrates the potential for improving them with RSA, opening up future avenues for understanding conceptual representation, language understanding, and social reasoning in LMs and humans.

On the Same Wavelength? Evaluating Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models across Broad Concepts

As AI systems take on collaborative roles, they must reason about shared goals and beliefs—not just generate fluent language. The Rational Speech Act (RSA) framework offers a principled approach to pragmatic reasoning, but existing extensions face challenges in scaling to multi-turn, collaborative scenarios. In this paper, we introduce Collaborative Rational Speech Act (CRSA), an information-theoretic (IT) extension of RSA that models multi-turn dialog by optimizing a gain function adapted from rate-distortion theory. This gain is an extension of the gain model that is maximized in the original RSA model but takes into account the scenario in which both agents in a conversation have private information and produce utterances conditioned on the dialog. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CRSA on referential games and template-based doctor–patient dialogs in the medical domain. Empirical results show that CRSA yields more consistent, interpretable, and collaborative behavior than existing baselines—paving the way for more pragmatic and socially aware language agents.

Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog

Today, large language models are widely used as judges to evaluate responses from other language models. Hence, it is imperative to benchmark and improve these LLM-judges on real-world language model usage: a typical human-assistant conversation is lengthy, and shows significant diversity in topics, intents, and requirements across turns, e.g. social interactions, task requests, feedback. We present Amulet, a framework that leverages pertinent linguistic concepts of dialog-acts and maxims to improve the accuracy of LLM-judges on preference data with complex, multi-turn conversational context. Amulet presents valuable insights about (a) the communicative structures and intents present in the conversation (dialog acts), and (b) the satisfaction of conversational principles (maxims) by the preference responses, and uses them to make judgments. On four challenging datasets, Amulet shows that (a) humans frequently (60-70% of the time) change their intents from one turn of the conversation to the next, and (b) in ∼75% of instances, the preference responses can be differentiated via dialog acts and/or maxims, reiterating the latter’s significance in judging such data. Amulet can be used either as a judge by applying the framework to a single LLM, or integrated into a jury with different LLM judges; our judges and juries show strong improvements on relevant baselines for all four datasets.

 Amulet: Putting Complex Multi-Turn Conversations on the Stand with LLM Juries

With the growing spread of misinformation online, understanding how true news evolves into fake news has become crucial for early detection and prevention. However, previous research has often assumed fake news inherently exists rather than exploring its gradual formation. To address this gap, we propose textbfFUSE (textbfFake news evoltextbfUtion textbfSimulation framtextbfEwork), a novel Large Language Model (LLM)-based simulation approach explicitly focusing on fake news evolution from real news. Our framework model a social network with four distinct types of LLM agents commonly observed in daily interactions: textit spreaders who propagate information, textitcommentators who provide interpretations, textitverifiers who fact-check, and textitstanders who observe passively to simulate realistic daily interactions that progressively distort true news. To quantify these gradual distortions, we develop textbfFUSE-EVAL, a comprehensive evaluation framework measuring truth deviation along multiple linguistic and semantic dimensions. Results show that FUSE effectively captures fake news evolution patterns and accurately reproduces known fake news, aligning closely with human evaluations. Experiments demonstrate that FUSE accurately reproduces known fake news evolution scenarios, aligns closely with human judgment, and highlights the importance of timely intervention at early stages. Our framework is extensible, enabling future research on broader scenarios of fake news:https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FUSE-7022/README.md.

The Stepwise Deception: Simulating the Evolution from True News to Fake News with LLM Agents

### Abstract Fine-grained understanding and species-specific, multimodal question answering are vital for advancing biodiversity conservation and ecological monitoring. However, existing multimodal large language models (MM-LLMs) face challenges when it comes to specialized topics like avian species, making it harder to provide accurate and contextually relevant information in these areas. To address this limitation, we introduce the **MAviS-Dataset**, a large-scale multimodal avian species dataset that integrates image, audio, and text modalities for over 1,000 bird species, comprising both pretraining and instruction-tuning subsets. Building on the MAviS-Dataset, we present **MAviS-Chat**, an audio-visual multimodal LLM designed for fine-grained species understanding, multimodal question answering, and scene-specific description generation Finally, for quantitative evaluation, we introduce **MAviS-Bench**, a benchmark of over 25,000 QA pairs designed to assess avian species-specific fine-grained perceptual and reasoning abilities of MM-LLMs across different modalities. Experimental results show that MAviS-Chat outperforms the baseline MiniCPM-o-2.6 by a large margin, achieving state-of-the-art open-source results and demonstrating the effectiveness of our MAviS-Dataset. Our results highlight the necessity of domain-adaptive MM-LLMs for ecological applications. *Our code, training data, evaluation benchmark, and models will be publicly released to support future research.*

MAviS: A Multimodal Conversational Assistant For Avian Species

To enable broader deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), it is essential to identify the best-performing model under strict memory constraints. We present AMQ, Automated Mixed-Precision Weight-Only Quantization, a framework that assigns layer-wise quantization bit-widths to optimally balance model quality and memory usage. However, the combinatorial search space, with over 10¹⁰⁰ possible configurations, makes conventional black-box optimization infeasible. AMQ overcomes this challenge through four key innovations: (1) **search space pruning** using prior knowledge to exclude unpromising configurations, (2) **quantization proxy** to bypass costly format conversions during search, (3) **quality predictor** to minimize evaluation overhead, and (4) **iterative search-and-update** strategy for fast and stable convergence. By integrating these components, AMQ efficiently explores the quality–efficiency landscape, reaching the Pareto frontier and yielding LLMs that are both compact and high-performing.

AMQ: Enabling AutoML for Mixed-precision Weight-Only Quantization of Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various tasks, including logical reasoning. However, their propensity for generating incorrect or inconsistent responses remains a significant concern. To address this issue, we propose FoVer (First-order logic Verification), an automated pipeline that verifies the logical correctness of reasoning texts using first-order logic. The pipeline operates in two main steps: (1) LLM-driven translation of natural language into executable logical expressions, and (2) automated logical verification using the Z3 theorem prover. We evaluate FoVer on specialized logical datasets (ProofWriter and FOLIO) and real-world LLM outputs (REVEAL). The results demonstrate that FoVer significantly outperforms existing methods in logical verification, showing notable improvements in accuracy across both ideal and practical scenarios. The pipeline also demonstrates its potential in identifying annotation errors in existing datasets, and it could be utilized for constructing new logical reasoning datasets. This work presents a significant step forward in enhancing the trustworthiness of LLM outputs, particularly in tasks requiring logical integrity.

Downloads

Next from EMNLP 2025

DART: Distilling Autoregressive Reasoning to Silent Thought

Similar lecture

Enhancing Temporal Understanding in Audio Question Answering for Large Audio Language Models