Austria

Animal research, sometimes referred to as preclinical research, plays a vital role in bridging the gap between basic science and clinical applications. However, the rapid increase in publications and the complexity of reported findings make it increasingly difficult for researchers to extract and assess relevant information. While automation through natural language processing (NLP) holds great potential for addressing this challenge, progress is hindered by the absence of high-quality, comprehensive annotated resources specific to preclinical studies. To fill this gap, we introduce PreClinIE, a fully open manually annotated dataset. The corpus consists of abstracts and methods sections from 725 publications, annotated for study rigor indicators (e.g., random allocation) and other study characteristics (e.g., species). We describe the data collection and annotation process, outlining the challenges of working with preclinical literature. By providing this resource, we aim to accelerate the development of NLP tools that enhance literature mining in preclinical research.

ACL 2025

PreClinIE: An Annotated Corpus for Information Extraction in Preclinical Studies

Congratulations to all the researchers who have qualified for the AMA Research Challenge virtual poster symposium and semifinals!

Welcome to the **largest national, multi-specialty research event** featuring research from nearly 1,000 medical students, residents, fellows, and international medical graduates across six topic areas - basic science, clinical and translational research, clinical vignettes, health systems science, medical education, and public health and health policy.

#### Access the Event
Use the buttons below or navigation menu to access the event. 

[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/d4076f2146939317a29eb9f69c53ad41.png)](https://underline.io/events/506/sessions?searchGroup=all)
[![](https://assets.underline.io/markdown_image/1/image/6bcee0b523a4874c4292ca0415d88dde.png)](https://underline.io/events/506/posters?searchGroup=all)

#### Event Details
The 2025 AMA Research Challenge includes the following symposium halls:
* **Semifinals hall:** Features research from 54 medical students, residents and international medical graduates that received top scores during first round scoring. 
* **Poster symposium hall:** Features research from nearly 1,000 medical students, residents and international medical graduates categorized by topics and subtopics.

**Here’s how to participate:**
* **View posters and presentations** on a variety of topics and specialties
* **Score posters in the semifinals** to help decide the top five finalists (AMA member exclusive opportunity)
* **Connect with presenters** and provide feedback to help advance their research
* **New this year: Watch live poster presentations** by topic area and engage directly with researchers

At the conclusion of this event, the AMA announced the top five finalists who advanced to the AMA Research Challenge final round, presented their research to an elite panel of judges, and competed to win a $10,000 grand prize presented by Laurel Road.

**Addison Shenk, a fourth-year medical student from Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine, was the winner of the 2025 AMA Research Challenge and was awarded the grand prize of $10,000, presented by Laurel Road.**

#### A message from Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, AMA President
<div style="position: relative; width: 100%; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
  <iframe 
    src="https://underline.io/embed/136894-ama-video?t=0"
    title="AMA Welcome Video"
    allowfullscreen
    style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border: 0;">
  </iframe>
</div>


#### Recognized Institutions
In 2025, 1,400 abstracts were submitted across six topic areas representing 174 medical schools and more than 150 residency and health care institutions. [See if your institution is represented this year!](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eFrTqCmCeobx9pr5drJK2hllvsIpFNOY/view?usp=drive_link)

#### Grand Prize Sponsor
AMA would like to thank Laurel Road, a brand of KeyBank, for sponsoring a $10,000 grand prize for the winner of the AMA Research Challenge. Laurel Road and KeyBank are not involved in winner selection process. The winner will be announced during the AMA Research Challenge final round. Payment of the grand prize will be directly from Laurel Road/KeyBank. See the [AMA Research Challenge Official Rules for terms and conditions](https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/research-challenge-official-rules.pdf).

[![](https://assets.underline.io/uploads/markdown_image/1/image/611e331d4a0eba0920f240cfc04b4d77.png)](https://www.laurelroad.com/)

#### Code of Conduct
<html>
AMA has a code of conduct for its meetings – we ask all attendees to adhere to this code to participate in this year’s meeting. Please read and <a href="https://www.ama-assn.org/about/code-conduct" target="_blank">learn more here</a> about your conduct requirements.
<br><br>
	</html>
	

#### Semifinals Judges

You need to log in with the email address you registered with. Access credentials have been sent to your email. 

Please be sure to check your spam and other email folders if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Need help? Contact us at <support@underline.io>.

Please log in to explore this event.

If you have used the AMA Research Challenge platform previously, please click the ‘Log-in’ button below. If you do not remember your password, please click “forgot password” and follow prompts to reset your password. After resetting your password, please refresh your webpage to access the platform. 

Register to explore research in a variety of topics. AMA members get exclusive access to score posters in the semifinals. 

**Please use [this link here](https://www.ama-assn.org/member-benefits/events/ama-research-challenge) to register for free. **

Registration Is Required

AMA Research Challenge 2025 

Join the AMA Research Challenge poster symposium and semifinals to explore top research posters and score posters in the semifinals (an AMA member exclusive opportunity).

workshop paper

### Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Message from the General Chair:<br>
*It is my great pleasure and honor to welcome you to the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for  Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025), held in beautiful Vienna, Austria, from July 27 to August 1, 2025.  ACL2025continues our field’s tradition of excellence in scholarship, innovation, and inclusivity, and I am  deeply grateful to the many volunteers who have worked tirelessly to bring this event to life.*<br>
[Read more](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GI_hvOpjswAuYdUTromfeDiPpCcqidwg/view?usp=sharing)<br><br><br>



To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. <br>Access credentials will be sent to your email from Underline -  subject line "Welcome to ACL 2025". Please be sure to check your spam email folder if you do not see an email confirmation right away.

Please log in

To access this event page, you need to log in with the **email address you registered with**. 

Welcome to The 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2025)

Many language models (LMs) in the literature claim excellent zero-shot and/or few-shot capabilities for named entity recognition (NER) and relation extraction (RE) tasks and assert their ability to generalize beyond their training datasets. However, these claims have yet to be tested across different model architectures. This paper presents a performance evaluation of zero-shot relation triplet extraction (NER followed by RE of the entities) for both small and large LMs, utilizing 13,867 texts from 61 biomedical corpora and encompassing 151 unique entity types. This comprehensive evaluation offers valuable insights into the practical applicability and performance of LMs within the intricate domain of biomedical relation triplet extraction, highlighting their effectiveness in managing a diverse range of relations and entity types. Gemini 1.5 Pro, the largest LM included in the study, was the top-performing zero-shot model, achieving an average partial match micro F1 of 0.492 for NER, followed closely by SciLitLLM 1.5 14B with a score of 0.475. Fine-tuned models generally outperformed others on the corpora they were trained on, even in a few-shot setting, but struggled to generalize across all datasets with similar entity types. No models achieved an F1 score above 0.5 for the RTE task on any dataset, and their scores fluctuated based on the specific class of entity and the dataset involved. This observation highlights that there is still large room for improvement on the zero-shot utility of LMs in biomedical RTE applications.

Benchmarking zero-shot biomedical relation triplet extraction across language model architectures

Extractive question answering over clinical text is a crucial need to help deal with the deluge of clinical text generated in hospitals. While encoder models (e.g., BERT) have been popular for this reading comprehension--style question answering task, recently encoder-decoder models (e.g., T5) are on the rise. There is also the emergence of preference optimization techniques to align decoder-only LLMs with human preferences. In this paper, we combine encoder-decoder models with the direct preference optimization (DPO) method for the RadQA radiology question answering task. Our approach achieves a 12--15 F1 point improvement over previous state-of-the-art models. To the best of our knowledge, this effort is the first to show that DPO method also works for reading comprehension via novel heuristics to generate preference data without human inputs.

RadQA-DPO: A Radiology Question Answering System with Encoder-Decoder Models Enhanced by Direct Preference Optimization

This paper presents a pipeline for mitigating gender bias in large language models (LLMs) used in medical literature by neutralizing gendered occupational pronouns. A set of 379,000 PubMed abstracts from 1965-1980 was processed to identify and modify pronouns tied to professions. We developed a BERT-based model, "Modern Occupational Bias Elimination with Refined Training," or "MOBERT," trained on these neutralized abstracts, and compared it with "1965BERT," trained on the original dataset. MOBERT achieved a 70% inclusive replacement rate, while 1965BERT reached only 4%. A further analysis of MOBERT revealed that pronoun replacement accuracy correlated with the frequency of occupational terms in the training data. We propose expanding the dataset and refining the pipeline to improve performance and ensure more equitable language modeling in medical applications.

Gender-Neutral Large Language Models for Medical Applications: Reducing Bias in PubMed Abstracts

Large Language Models (LLMs) have approached human-level performance in text generation and summarization, yet their application in clinical settings remains constrained by potential inaccuracies that could lead to serious consequences. This work addresses the critical safety weaknesses in medical documentation systems by focusing on detecting subtle errors that require specialized medical expertise. We introduce a novel multi-agent debating framework that achieves 78.8\% accuracy on medical error detection, significantly outperforming both single-agent approaches and previous multi-agent systems. Our framework leverages specialized LLM agents with asymmetric access to complementary medical knowledge sources (Mayo Clinic and WebMD), engaging them in structured debate to identify inaccuracies in clinical notes. A judge agent evaluates these arguments based solely on their medical reasoning quality, with agent-specific performance metrics incorporated as feedback for developing situation-specific trust models.

Error Detection in Medical Note through Multi Agent Debate

Biomedical entity linking models disambiguate mentions in text by matching them with unique biomedical concepts. This problem is commonly addressed using a two-stage pipeline comprising an inexpensive candidate generator, which filters a subset of suitable entities for a mention, and a costly but precise reranker that provides the final matching between the mention and the concept. With the goal of applying two-stage entity linking at scale, we explore the construction of effective cross-encoder reranker models, capable of scoring multiple mention-entity pairs simultaneously. Through experiments on four entity linking datasets, we show that our cross-encoder models provide between 2.7 to 36.97 times faster training speeds and 3.42 to 26.47 times faster inference speeds than a base cross-encoder model capable of scoring only one entity, while achieving similar accuracy (differences between -3.42% to 2.76% Acc@1).

Accelerating Cross-Encoders in Biomedical Entity Linking

In this work, we propose a structured four-step prompting strategy that explicitly guides large language models (LLMs) through (1) claim comprehension, (2) evidence analysis, (3) intermediate conclusion, and (4) entailment decision-making to improve the accuracy of biomedical claim verification. This strategy leverages compositional and human-like reasoning to enhance logical consistency and factual grounding to reduce reliance on memorizing few-Shot exemplars and help LLMs generalize reasoning patterns across different biomedical claim verification tasks. Through extensive evaluation on biomedical NLI benchmarks, we analyze the individual contributions of each reasoning step. Our findings demonstrate that comprehension, evidence analysis, and intermediate conclusion each play distinct yet complementary roles. Systematic prompting and carefully designed step-wise instructions not only unlock the latent cognitive abilities of LLMs but also enhance interpretability by making it easier to trace errors and understand the model's reasoning process. Our research aims to improve the reliability of AI-driven biomedical claim verification.

Advancing Biomedical Claim Verification by Using Large Language Models with Better Structured Prompting Strategies

Accurately mapping medical procedure names from healthcare providers to standardized terminology used by insurance companies is a crucial yet complex task. Inconsistencies in naming conventions lead to missclasified procedures, causing administrative inefficiencies and insurance claim problems in private healthcare settings. Many companies still use human resources for manual mapping, while there is a clear opportunity for automation. This paper proposes a retrieval-based architecture leveraging sentence embeddings for medical name matching in the Romanian healthcare system. This challenge is significantly more difficult in underrepresented languages such as Romanian, where existing pretrained language models lack domain-specific adaptation to medical text. We evaluate multiple embedding models, including Romanian, multilingual, and medical-domain-specific representations, to identify the most effective solution for this task. Our findings contribute to the broader field of medical NLP for low-resource languages such as Romanian.

A Retrieval-Based Approach to Medical Procedure Matching in Romanian

Gastroenterology (GI) cancer surveillance scheduling relies on extracting structured data from unstructured clinical texts, such as endoscopy and pathology reports. Traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) models have been employed for this task, but recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) present a new opportunity for automation without requiring extensive labeled datasets. In this study, we propose an LLM-based entity extraction and rule-based decision support framework for Barrett's Oesophagus (BO) surveillance timing prediction. Our approach processes endoscopy and pathology reports to extract clinically relevant information and structures it into a standardised format, which is then used to determine appropriate surveillance intervals. We evaluate multiple state-of-the-art LLMs on real-world clinical datasets from two hospitals, assessing their performance in accuracy and running time cost. The results demonstrate that LLMs, particularly Phi-4 and (DeepSeek distilled) Qwen-2.5, can effectively automate the extraction of BO surveillance-related information with high accuracy, while Phi-4 is also efficient during inference. We also compared the trade-offs between LLMs and fine-tuned non-LLMs. Our findings indicate that LLM extraction based methods can support clinical decision-making by providing justifications from report extractions, reducing manual workload, and improving guideline adherence in BO surveillance scheduling.

Improving Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance Scheduling with Large Language Models: A Structured Extraction Approach

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly impacted medical Natural Language Processing (NLP), enabling automated information extraction from unstructured clinical texts. However, selecting the most suitable approach requires careful evaluation of different model architectures, such as generative LLMs and BERT-based models, along with appropriate adaptation strategies, including prompting techniques, or fine-tuning.

Prompting Large Language Models for Italian Clinical Reports: A Benchmark Study

Several studies explored different LLM implementations, highlighting their effectiveness in medical domain, including complex diagnostics patterns as for example in rheumatology. However, their application to Italian remains limited, serving as a key example of the broader gap in non-English language research. In this study, we present a task-specific benchmark analysis comparing generative LLMs and BERT-based models, on real-world Italian clinical reports. We evaluated zero-shot prompting, in-context learning (ICL), and fine-tuning across eight diagnostic categories in the rheumatology area. Results show that ICL improves performance over zero-shot-prompting, particularly for Mixtral and Gemma models. Overall, BERT fine-tuning present the highest performance, while ICL outperforms BERT in specific diagnoses, such as renal and systemic, suggesting that prompting can be a potential alternative when labeled data is scarce."

Downloads

Next from ACL 2025

Benchmarking zero-shot biomedical relation triplet extraction across language model architectures

Similar lecture

Impact of an Anatomy Lab-Based Workshop on Preclinical Medical Student Interest in Neurology