CogSci 2025

•

August 01, 2025

•

San Francisco, United States

keywords:

learning

psychology

perception

artificial intelligence

neural networks

Minsky and Papert's (1969) book Perceptrons is often remembered as the book that (counter-productively) ended neural network research for nearly two decades. One of the authors' main results was that perceptrons (under reasonable limitations) cannot detect if a pattern is fully connected. Perhaps less known, to their initial surprise, the authors also showed that if guaranteed there are no holes in an image, perceptrons can detect if a pattern is fully connected. Given the simplicity of perceptrons, it seems reasonable to think that they might suggest a lower bound for what humans can visually detect without moving their eyes. If so, the results on connectedness suggest some counter-intuitive findings about human perception, namely that we should be able to learn to solve 2D mazes at a glance and detect how many objects are in an image at a glance (i.e., subitize) even when the number is large.

Downloads

Paper

Next from CogSci 2025

Unifying inference and selection in singular causal explanation
poster

Unifying inference and selection in singular causal explanation

CogSci 2025

Stephanie Droop
Neil Bramley
Tadeg Quillien
Stephanie Droop and 2 other authors

01 August 2025

Similar lecture

Multilayer Perceptrons as Weighted Conditional Knowledge Bases: an Overview
technical paper

Multilayer Perceptrons as Weighted Conditional Knowledge Bases: an Overview

AIxIA 2021

Laura Giordano
Laura Giordano and 1 other author

01 December 2021